you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 2 months ago (19 children)

Elections≠Democracy. Again, you are expecting liberal west (or hegemonic) "democracy". I am not making a moral judgement of either, just trying to explain that the definition of democracy that has been shoved to the people's brain of the global north (hegemony) is not the only or the correct one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    What does hegemony mean here? And what would a non-hegemonic democracy look like?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    I mean it in Gramsci's terms. For the second question I would say the ones cited by OP are good examples but horizontal organization is my preferred one, look about EZLN ways of horizontal democracy. Again not saying they are the correct or morally good ones either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (15 children)

    the ones cited by OP are good examples

    How is North Korea a democracy?

    EZLN ways of horizontal democracy

    These seem to be distributed communities that internally use direct democracy (public assemblies). And I agree that direct democracy is a form of democracy. A very inefficient form that doesn't scale past the size of Greece or EZLN, but still a democracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    Voting is incredibly minimal at best but has marginally expanded since 2023 with some primaries.

    North Korea is basically if a trauma victim was a country, shellshocked after a genocidal bombing campaign. Blowback Season 4 goes into crazy detail about the war. That's what caused them to pioneer the tunnel technology we saw in Vietnam and also Gaza today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (13 children)

    Neither of those supports the stance that it should be considered a democracy though...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (12 children)

    You're missing the point..

    That's their version of Democratic Republic represention within the party, shaped by the material conditions of both the before-mentioned genocidal bombing campaign and the continued attempts of outside forces to collapse the state via CIA Activities and Sanctions designed to starve and isolate the entire country.

    You should check out the Blowback podcast if you're interested in The Korea War and how those events shaped Present-day North and South Korea

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (11 children)

    OP's post is a simple observation about the names of countries and their political alignment. There are probably numerous reasons and causes for both the name and the political alignment. But the observation still holds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (10 children)

    It's a massive simplification that removes all context of each of those countries anti-colonialist and anti-imperialist histories, all of which is incredibly important to understanding their current political organization and the scope that democracy holds in each.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Sure, but the root comment was implying that the countries mentioned in OP, like North Korea, are democracies. Which is clearly wrong. That's all I was saying.

    those countries anti-colonialist and anti-imperialist histories, all of which is incredibly important to understanding their current political organization

    Or alternatively, the names of these countries is just marketing, and socialist movements usually tend to be authoritarianism in disguise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (8 children)

    You can either investigate yourself or lean into your preconceived biases, if you're choosing the latter that's your choice.

    You clearly don't want to have an actual discussion that includes those nuances that take into account the geopolitics of global capitalism and material conditions, so let's just agree to disagree or something

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I'm just calling out what I consider bad justification under the guise of "nuance". Earlier in the thread, a user was claiming that North Korea was a sort of democracy. Now the goal posts have shifted to "yes it's authoritarian but here's why". If this were the argument from the start, this would be less of an issue. But what's problematic is this silent goal post shifting that I constantly see in these sorts of discussions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    authoritarian and democracy are not mutually exclusive concepts. I think ignoring the details of both aspects in favor of thought terminating clichés is counterproductive, assuming the goal is to actually understand the intricacies of these societies instead of a black and white understanding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Nobody is trying to imply a black and white view of the world, but that doesn't mean words don't have meaning. Just because North Korea has a semblance of elections doesn't make it democratic, just like the US isn't socialist even though it has welfare programs. And if you jumped into every discussion about US late stage capitalism with a "actually capitalism and socialism are not mutually exclusive", I would consider that just as counterproductive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    You're just proving my point here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Hmm, so your point was that you were in fact being counterproductive? If so I totally agree

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    You clearly don't even understand my point, because you're not bothering to learn anything. You can't even grasp the differences in economies, let alone the differences in how one is operated from a liberal party compared to a workers party.

    Do you even know the main difference between the Chinese economy and the US economy? Both are mixed, as in they both have elements of socialist and capitalist organization, yet are organized and controlled in vastly different ways. The US, and other western economies, are beholden to Capital interests, because the liberal parties subservient to Capital. The socialist aspect has been withered away since the gains of socialist forces for decades, because workers have no power. The Chinese economy is under the control of the CCP, a workers party. While the party itself is organized as a Democratic Republic, the State is under the dictatorship of that workers party, meaning that Capitalist forces are subservient to the state. And that's before the discussion of how a party can be communist, yet be able to wield the forces of capitalism within a controlled scope to rapidly industrialize key industries before taking state control to socialize those industries in the form of state capitalism. Let alone how worker cooperatives, where there is an actual socialist means of production, fit into the picture.

    No investigation, no right to speak

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    So the goal posts have shifted again. Let me remind you again, the root of this thread was about whether North Korea was authoritarian. Now you're talking about China vs US! I never mentioned China this whole time and was waiting to see when you would bring it up. Amazing.

    You seem to be very proud of your knowledge about China and want to show it off, even when it has no relevancy. I hope that works out for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment