you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Leg of lamb is a dish where one serves a leg that comes from a lamb. The name does not claim that the entire body of the lamb is served.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    Yes but when you say leg of lamb, most people don't give a shit which leg you're referring to.

    There are multiple sets of states that are united under a single national government and are part of the American continents (Mexico and Brazil, for example) but only one of them claims to be THE United States of America.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Was the USA the first set of "united states"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    In the Americas, and in the modern period yes, but the concept was not totally new. Switzerland was a kind of federal state since 1291: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Charter_of_1291

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I suppose it was. Good point.

    Come to think of it, what bothers me isn't our name so much as the attitude of so many of my fellow citizens that the rest of the world is of no consequence. Our name puts a fine point on that narrow world view, regardless of whether it was intended that way.

    So yeah, I'd rather see the culture change than the name.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    Only one of them IS THE United States of America. That's how names work.

    Nothing anywhere says "There are no other states that are united in any geographic region that you can refer to as 'America'". That's just silly.

    For example: Mexico is Estados Unidos. I like how they actually refer to the US as EEUU to differentiate. See? It works. You can make things work.

  • source
  • parent