They call it "dark traffic" - ads that are not seen by tech-savvy users who have excellent ad blockers.

Not surprised that its growing. The web is unusable without an ad blocker and its only getting worse, and will continue to get worse every month.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 419 points 1 year ago (26 children)

The trade body called it “illegal circumvention technology”

Lol. Fuck off.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 236 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Once the data enters my network it's my fucking data and I can do with it what I please.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 170 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Likewise, I can prevent anything from even entering my network that I don't want on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    Unless it’s intellectual property that belongs to the movie industry. Then you better not touch it. Or that’s illegal.

    But if it’s advertisements, then you have to watch it, or that’s illegal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago*

    The O.G. add blocker.

    1000029610

    The concept is close to the same, how could something like this be seen as “illegal circumvention technology”?

    It just shows us how disconnected the people in these positions can be that are regulating these things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    And this is exactly why Google did away with Manifest v2 (what uBlock runs on) and why they wanted to introduce their “web integrity” standard. At that point the pages would be signed with ads and in the signature didn’t match the page wouldn’t even be shown.

    They tried to play it off as “ensuring that you truly get the correct copy of the page and no bad hackers have intercepted it” but really it would have 100% forced ads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    To think that Google once had ads that I considered OK, just a bunch of text and links. How times have changed...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Advertisers will always keep pushing things trying to find the limit where people will just barely tolerate it. Then when they push it too far they cry "no fair!" When people stop putting up with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    Then I guess I'm not looking at those pages. No skin off my nose. That said, Firefox with Ublock Origin plus a couple of other ad-blockers seems to be working pretty well for me. Anything with a paywall, I just move on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Then I guess I'm not looking at those pages. No skin of my nose.

    That works until every website starts doing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I use Mullvad's VPN and DNS on a router level. Every device on my network is blanketed by it. Some services don't work, but I am willing to sacrifice their profits for my integrity. Thus, to them I say 然らば fuckmothers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They wont be happy until eye tracking technology makes sure we sit and watch their fucking ads before the actual content appears.

    I mean, none of this is getting better. Its only going to become worse. I have ads in the fucking pause screen on my streaming tv app. So if I want to take a toilet break, I get an ad in my face. Its just so ridiculous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    What most of these people don't get is if they didn't get so invasive with those ads, people would not have to resort to ad blockers. Be it tho shut up the ads every few seconds on YouTube or having to play whack-a-mole every time I read an article, eventually you run out of patience and say "enough!"

  • source
  • parent