▲ 43 ▼ Defeated Protocols (npub1lrnvvs6z78s9yjqxxr38uyqkmn34lsaxznnqgd877j4z2qej3j5s09qnw5.blossom.band) submitted 2 months ago by n7gifmdn@lemmy.ca to c/fedimemes@feddit.uk 20 comments fedilink hide all child comments ![]https://npub1lrnvvs6z78s9yjqxxr38uyqkmn34lsaxznnqgd877j4z2qej3j5s09qnw5.blossom.band/b139ff5264d97ed51a4614fdd545ef90532c289124602bfcf35ea94dd14723a0.png
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (9 children) Ok like I’ve seen nostr maybe ONCE what was/is it? permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago (8 children) It’s a federated protocol that uses public key cryptography to prove identity, so you don’t really have a “home server”. That also means there’s very little in the way of moderation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (6 children) Explains why the one time I’ve seen nostr come through it was some weird ass spam permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ale@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (5 children) Spam, cryptobros and PDFs. But once you block them its halfway decent. I mean as an alternative its ok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago (3 children) PDFs as in pirated books i.e. we might want to check out nostr even if only rarely for specific items of interest? Or like useless whitepapers i.e. nostr would have zero value to most of us (or I guess you are saying that heavy curation can restore some utility). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago PDFs as in Jeffery Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent [–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) I had to look it up, I didn't knew this sense either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago* Thanks! we might want to check out nostr even if only rarely for specific items of interest? I now vaguely regret some of my word choices then...! 😜 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago It's like if Wikipedia put the expectation of fact checking onto the end user. permalink fedilink source parent [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago That also means there’s very little in the way of moderation. I think this is more down to the mindset of the community of people who use it, than it is the fault of the technical design, which does go beyond just relying on private keys for identity, and could absolutely work out systems for effective moderation. But the Nostr community is mainly Bitcoin maxi libertarians, so maybe they just won't. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago (8 children) It’s a federated protocol that uses public key cryptography to prove identity, so you don’t really have a “home server”. That also means there’s very little in the way of moderation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (6 children) Explains why the one time I’ve seen nostr come through it was some weird ass spam permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ale@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (5 children) Spam, cryptobros and PDFs. But once you block them its halfway decent. I mean as an alternative its ok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago (3 children) PDFs as in pirated books i.e. we might want to check out nostr even if only rarely for specific items of interest? Or like useless whitepapers i.e. nostr would have zero value to most of us (or I guess you are saying that heavy curation can restore some utility). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago PDFs as in Jeffery Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent [–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) I had to look it up, I didn't knew this sense either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago* Thanks! we might want to check out nostr even if only rarely for specific items of interest? I now vaguely regret some of my word choices then...! 😜 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago It's like if Wikipedia put the expectation of fact checking onto the end user. permalink fedilink source parent [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago That also means there’s very little in the way of moderation. I think this is more down to the mindset of the community of people who use it, than it is the fault of the technical design, which does go beyond just relying on private keys for identity, and could absolutely work out systems for effective moderation. But the Nostr community is mainly Bitcoin maxi libertarians, so maybe they just won't. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (6 children) Explains why the one time I’ve seen nostr come through it was some weird ass spam permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ale@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (5 children) Spam, cryptobros and PDFs. But once you block them its halfway decent. I mean as an alternative its ok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago (3 children) PDFs as in pirated books i.e. we might want to check out nostr even if only rarely for specific items of interest? Or like useless whitepapers i.e. nostr would have zero value to most of us (or I guess you are saying that heavy curation can restore some utility). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago PDFs as in Jeffery Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent [–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) I had to look it up, I didn't knew this sense either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago* Thanks! we might want to check out nostr even if only rarely for specific items of interest? I now vaguely regret some of my word choices then...! 😜 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago It's like if Wikipedia put the expectation of fact checking onto the end user. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ale@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (5 children) Spam, cryptobros and PDFs. But once you block them its halfway decent. I mean as an alternative its ok permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago (3 children) PDFs as in pirated books i.e. we might want to check out nostr even if only rarely for specific items of interest? Or like useless whitepapers i.e. nostr would have zero value to most of us (or I guess you are saying that heavy curation can restore some utility). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago PDFs as in Jeffery Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent [–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) I had to look it up, I didn't knew this sense either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago* Thanks! we might want to check out nostr even if only rarely for specific items of interest? I now vaguely regret some of my word choices then...! 😜 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago It's like if Wikipedia put the expectation of fact checking onto the end user. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago (3 children) PDFs as in pirated books i.e. we might want to check out nostr even if only rarely for specific items of interest? Or like useless whitepapers i.e. nostr would have zero value to most of us (or I guess you are saying that heavy curation can restore some utility). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago PDFs as in Jeffery Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent [–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) I had to look it up, I didn't knew this sense either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago* Thanks! we might want to check out nostr even if only rarely for specific items of interest? I now vaguely regret some of my word choices then...! 😜 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago PDFs as in Jeffery Epstein. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 child) I had to look it up, I didn't knew this sense either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago* Thanks! we might want to check out nostr even if only rarely for specific items of interest? I now vaguely regret some of my word choices then...! 😜 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago* Thanks! we might want to check out nostr even if only rarely for specific items of interest? I now vaguely regret some of my word choices then...! 😜 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago It's like if Wikipedia put the expectation of fact checking onto the end user. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago That also means there’s very little in the way of moderation. I think this is more down to the mindset of the community of people who use it, than it is the fault of the technical design, which does go beyond just relying on private keys for identity, and could absolutely work out systems for effective moderation. But the Nostr community is mainly Bitcoin maxi libertarians, so maybe they just won't. permalink fedilink source parent