Amazon is facing fresh scrutiny over the use of physical books for artificial intelligence training after an investigation reportedly tracked a shipment of hard-to-find titles to a company facility in Las Vegas, where workers allegedly cut the bindings from books before scanning their pages and eventually destroying them.

The investigation, reported by 404 Media, involved placing a tracking device inside a book from a large order and following its journey across the United States. The shipment ultimately reached an Amazon facility associated with an operation known as VGT3.

The discovery has raised concerns among booksellers, librarians and readers about what happens to physical books once they are acquired as potential sources of AI training data.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 43 points 2 months ago (15 children)

Words cannot express how much I fucking hate corporate AI

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago* (8 children)

    Fascism*
    Nazis burning 📚
    Modern day book burning

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    How is this in any way comparable to that? The bad thing abt nazi book burning wasnt the destruction of physical copies of books, but the destruction of knowledge and their intent behind it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    hard-to-find titles

    but the destruction of knowledge

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I think their point is that scanning preserves the content rather than destroying it, but I'm guessing the scans aren't exactly public.

    Destroying the original is flat out stupid from every angle unless it's unavoidable or destruction (or taking control) is the goal.

    Honestly it might be worse if that's not the idea, but yeah it's still nazi coded at best

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    the scans aren’t exactly public.

    Exactly.

    destruction (or taking control) is the goal.

    Every fascist regime’s is.

    nazi coded at best

    Now that you know, what are you going to do about this?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)
    1. So the only scenario where your think makes sense if we have a seller with a book that is the only unit in existance and it is not digitized.
    2. The bad thing about nazi book burnings was the targetting of the books of political enemies and jewish authors. This isn't the case here. They destroy at most one copy of any book across the board.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
    1. That's what rare & H2F means
    2. Read point one, carefully. If the books weren't rare, it wouldn't have enemies, but more commonly copied. Like the Christian Bible.
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I'm flirting with radicalization over here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Was global warming not enough?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Welcome to the movement. This is a good book to get started. I would recommend you to skip straight to chapter 1.

    The Conquest of Bread

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments