-25
A miser is someone who is infatuated with the past, and is grumpy about the present, so when did it come to mean someone who is a cheapskate and stingy over money? (lemmy.today)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/AskUSA@discuss.online
locked 39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A miser is someone who is infatuated with the past, and is grumpy about the present, (compared to depressive, or someone who is infatuated with the future, and depressed about the present), so when did it come to mean someone who is a cheapskate and stingy over money?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] [S] -10 points 2 months ago (10 children)

what's your question?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    where did you get the definition of “miser” from? because its wrong.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -9 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    “Miser is a grumpy person who lives in the past, instead of the present”, was the definition people used in the US before 2016.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I literally cited a dictionary. Ill assume youre being obtuse on purpose at this point, engaging in bad faith.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -9 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    cite a dictionary from before 2016, instead, that's not online

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    ok good bye.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    the definition for miser somehow, and some when, changed from "grumpy person who lives in the past", to "someone stingy over money and is cheapskate".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Yes. But where did you see this? what gave you that definition?

    Some vague memory is not valid.

    youve had your question answered. why are you arguing?

    The basis of your premise is factually wrong.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] -8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    just because 'the definition for miser somehow, and some when, changed from “grumpy person who lives in the past”, to “someone stingy over money and is cheapskate”' is not mentioned elsewhere, does not make it false.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •