Arch is different...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago*

    It's a problem regardless of what OS it happens to. I've personally/professionally found it much more frequent that an update breaks something on linux vs. windows, but it's also much easier to fix those issues & they're rarely the kind of critical failure you get with a M$ OS.

    (and if you truly crave stability, Debian is always happy to welcome you back into it's big soft embrace)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I've yet to have one of my windows systems brick itself. Several of my Linux systems have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    Same, at-least everything past Windows Vista era of operating systems. I guess Microsoft has the resources to test and deploy to most types of hardware configurations so the chances of getting a borked update is rarer compared to other OS's like Arch and Mint which have a smaller user base but more diverse hardware configurations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I haven't had a Windows install completely brick itself, but I have seen Windows go into a try to update->update fails->rollback->updates are available->tries to update again... etc. infinite loop.

    It's been a while since I've had a Linux system brick that wasn't me doing something stupid, though I've gotten a lot better at handling the occasional minor hiccup.

  • source
  • parent