Gigabit goal “prejudicial” to satellite and wireless

Ah, so money changed hands. Got it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    But to yell at a cloud for a moment, if we're being honest most people should not need gigabit.

    For now*

    The way tech moves, this won’t be the case forever. And it’ll be better to have it already then need it and have to wait another decade for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    I get your point but also that's a bias borne from the industrial and technological revolutions, it's entirely possible that we may already are seeing the slow down of large scale technological advances from every 2-4 years seeing major leaps to every ten years or more, hell I cant think of any major tech jumps over the last 10 years of particular note outside of AI (hurk) and battery/ green energy neither of which need faster internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    640K ought to be enough for anybody.

    He was wrong then, and you're wrong that nobody needs gigabit. Stop handwringing for big corporations. This isn't a difficult thing to do, it just makes companies slightly less money. America has some of the most expensive internet in the world, and some of the worst per mb.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)