506
Roblox argues 8-year-old waived rights in wrongful death lawsuit (www.courier-journal.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Can an 8-year-old waive their rights to sue a company by clicking a box?

That's the stance of Roblox, an online gaming platform that bills itself as a digital playground.

The argument comes as the $41-billion company is embroiled in a lawsuit with the family of a Northern Kentucky child whose death by suicide, her mother says, is related to use of the platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 129 points 2 months ago (8 children)

any mention of "waiving your rights" should always automatically be null, no matter who it concerns. by definition it places the corporation above the law. Might as well let corporations authorize people to kill, steal and do other crimes if that is allowed.

we need global capital punishment for corporations

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 54 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You can't sign any rights away in the EU.

    It's great because I know my rights here and I can just accept any terms knowing they can't fuck me over no matter what I accept.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago*

    Do you have any concrete examples of this being enforced in practice?

    All I see:

    • our data still gets collected
    • our phones, TVs, wiretap "assistants" still spy on us and upload all of our information to personal datasets that companies can access
    • "deleting your data" as per GDPR is just a database flag/row that says the data says it is deleted
    • EU just authorized any and all companies to spy on your communications 24/7, 365 days a year
    • freedom of speech/expression doesn't exist here any more than in America, maybe less

    Our right to privacy (freedom right pillar) is literally daily being violeted 1000 times over and the most I have ever seen happen is a slap on the wrist 0.01% of yearly revenue fine that didn't change anything. Companies can fuck you over all they like unless you have a 10million € army of lawyers...

    Also how is it going in Germany with the Palestine protester that had been locked in solitary confinement (known torture) for 23 hours per day for the past almost year after a show trial kangaroo court where they wouldn't allow even any independent record of the trial inside (violation of both dignity and justice pillars)

    There is precious little enforcement of many rights, so we absolutely cannot take them for granted and have to fight for them on every front.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Not a lawyer, but if i hire someone to kill someone and put that in writing, I can't sue that person for not doing his job because the contract has no legal value. Not sure on the details, but if i understand correctly a contract between two people cannot cover things that are outside the law. Meaning the law of contracts (like TOS) is inferior to the law of killing people. Seems like this is not true for America, but here i've heard of consumers winning lawsuits based on this principle.

    We do need global punishment for corporations, but it would not be the only solution: corporation have to abide to local laws.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    if they cant be punished globally, they cant be made to obey local laws. Kind of like if you could do crimes in one country and just leave after heat gets too bad. For us, interpol will go after you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    For individuals it is a lot easier to go to another country to evade punishment. If a company does that they also can't produce or sell there themselves and will have to find another company to act as an intermediary. Also, in this case it is about a dragging someone to court. It is hard to take a us software company to court, but it does happen. For example, a Dutch organisation took Meta to court for not allowing users to receive a feed with only the accounts they follow. They won that case. A celeb had his identity used by fraudsters who used Google Ads to trick people into buying certain crypto, he won the case. Yes companies get away with a lot, but they are 'made to obey local laws' from time to time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    they dont get fines that matter though, otherwise they wouldnt act like they are just cost of doing business. fine for breaking law for big corporation should be big they are actually scared of getting fined.

    And company being able to to evade punishment via intermediary is not right either. breaking the law should mean they get left behind by competitors

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •