The Finnish government is now a substantial way through its programme to cut €9 billion of public spending by 2027, including large reductions to social security (including housing, child, and unemployment benefits) healthcare, education, and municipal funding budgets, while it also increasing taxes on average earners. Cuts to healthcare provision have been particularly brutal, including a large reduction in hospital staff numbers, elderly care and disability services while redefining "minimum service obligations" to justify providing patients with lower quality care. The government has also slashed funding for organisations working on peace and initiatives which would address the new cold war-style relations with Russia.

And among the beneficiaries of a new tooled-up and aggressive Finland are the arms dealers of the Israeli apartheid-genocide complex, which in 2024 sold Finland its questionably functional "David's Sling" air defence system for €316 million. Finland has also bought tank and ship missiles from the Israeli company Rafael which supplied most of the weapons and equipment used to commit the genocide of Gaza. The Finnish government said Israel's genocide of Gaza would not stop it buying weapons from the country, a position which is par for the course among the morally bankrupt leaders of Europe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 2 months ago (18 children)

Finland needs to be prepared to defend itself from a vile imperialist who does not know the meaning of good faith negotiation.

Previously:

Previously:

NATO expansion:

 
NATO in general:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago

    What's the problem? It's literally full of sources and documentation that counters your worldview. How is it too much to present that? Just want to keep you and your thoughts inside a bubble?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    How does that change Russia being an imperialist country filled with neonazis of its own?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Russia is not an imperialist country at present, despite Western propaganda to the opposite. Previously:

    Russia, if given its druthers, would be imperialist, but since it presently doesn’t, it presently isn’t. Putin tried to join NATO once, to join the imperialist club, but that was rejected, because the US wanted Russia Balkanized & plundered instead. Russia has figured out it’s better off allying with Global South countries than attempting imperialist adventures upon them. And this war has accelerated that allyship.

    And while Russia does have a few neonazis, as most countries do, they don’t hold a candle to the scale of Ukraine’s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Wagner group alone is a neonazi organization that had tens of thousands of members just a few years ago, an order of magnitude more than the famous Azov brigade. And it's literally named after Hitler's favourite composer.

    Neonazis are only an issue for Putin when they can be used as justification for war. Otherwise, they don't matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Neonazis are only an issue for Putin when they can be used as justification for war. Otherwise, they don’t matter.

    Well duh. Like in every capitalist state. What matters is how much power they hold and in ukraine they're in the highest echelons of command.

    order of magnitude more

    Both azovs number about 100k, 12th army corps around 70k. And those I know for sure incorporate nazis throughout entire command structure. Then there's 59th and their entire unmanned forces with reichsadler as an insignia :v

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -12 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    I only believe western media when it suits my world view vibes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    When media admits things that runs against their interests/narratives it is more believable than when it fits in with their narratives and interests generally yes. Is that really a controversial idea?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Or maybe you have a media literacy problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Taking bias and interests into account when evaluating how much stock to take in a piece of information and it's source is a media literacy problem in your eyes?

    Are you sure you're not the one with the problem?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    There is always a reason everything is published and it is never to "keep the public informed". Just because you happen to agree with it doesn't make it any more factual or less disinformation than the ones you don't agree with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    it is never to “keep the public informed”

    When did I ever say it was? Infact my comments very clearly point to the reality of pushing narratives to forward the interests of those who own/control the media.

    Just because you happen to agree with it doesn’t make it any more factual or less disinformation than the ones you don’t agree with.

    Fucking obviously. Thank you for the truism. But again literally entirely irrelevant to what I said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It's not at all irrelevant. They are always bullshitting you. That is the only thing you can be sure of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Are you incapable of comprehending what I said?

    Admissions against one's interests hold more weight than claims in ones own interests.

    This is a fact.

    At no point did I make any claim about it being any media outlet telling the truth or any other such idiotic stawman you are attempting to build.

  • source
  • parent