you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 2 months ago (15 children)

Isn't The Matrix just an allegory about being transgender?

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 2 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Fully intentional:

    The Matrix films are about being transgender, the trilogy's co-director says.

    "That was the original intention but the world wasn't quite ready," says Lilly Wachowski, who came out as trans along with her sister Lana after the films came out.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-53692435

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    Except:

    Speaking with Them: Wachowski clarifies her previous comments, explaining that The Matrix was not intended to be a trans allegory when it was in production. While she acknowledges the movie’s strong trans themes, she says the ideas came about naturally, without intention on her or co-director Lana Wachowski’s part. Check out what Wachowski had to say below:

    No, I didn’t [confirm The Matrix is a trans allegory].

    Yeah, so that came from an interview I did for Disclosure. They had a bunch of Matrix questions. And the question they asked me was about Switch, who was originally written as a trans character who was male in the real world and female in the matrix. And they took that response and attached the question that everyone now references that it’s a trans allegory. And so it was slightly out of context, but I don’t sit here and put a stink up about it, because it is a trans allegory in that it was written by two closeted trans women. And so all of the things that are in it are super-duper trans. The idea of transformation, even the whole “My name is Neo, Mr. Anderson —” that idea of claiming identity, it’s undeniable.

    Yeah, with all the decisions we made with that film, there’s just this burbling transness simmering below everything. So when I look back at the way that we cast those two parts, I can see how obvious it is that they’re one part in a lot of ways; that they’re two sides of the same coin. It’s not like these were conscious decisions, but more like we’re finding our way instinctively as these two closeted trans women. So all those things that your receptors are buzzing about are completely valid. When people say, “Oh, it’s a trans allegory,” it’s like, “Yeah… it is, but we weren’t like, Hey, let’s write a trans allegory.” That’s not how it started. We were like, “Hey, let’s write this action film,” and then we got our trans all over it. [laughs]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Okay weird. The BBC article reads totally different and there's a lot of statements put into a new context.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Whatever, it's a better retcon than everything J.K.Rowling said about Harry Potter.

    The Matrix having a bunch of trans themes > Dumbledore having a throbbing gay sex backstory and the 1 jewish student being named Goldstein.

    The Matrix actually supports those themes and readings within the work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    No, there was reading material attached to the script and it was mostly metaphysical and philosophy. Not sure the watchowskis actually understood what they wrote by the end of 3, they maintained it wasn't ALL the matrix even though that seems to be what they wrote and fits with the books they pulled inspiration from

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    From that article:

    Lilly doesn't know "how present my transness was in the background of my brain as we were writing" The Matrix.

    They weren't consciously making it a trans allegory. And, the studio would never have accepted it if that was all it was. In retrospect it's obvious that that was a major influence in the story they were telling. And, they're happy that in the present people are interpreting it that way. But, it wasn't as intentional as people like to claim, and that's far from the only possible interpretation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    It has been ruthlessly coopted by people who want to see it that way and refuse to believe that any other interpretation could possibly exist.

    I freely admit that the the fact that the writers and directors later both changed their gender makes a good case that that was an element of the story.

    But, this was also a huge budget action movie produced by a mainstream Hollywood studio in 1999 when the world was far less trans-friendly than even today. There's no way they would have OK'd a movie that could only be interpreted as a trans allegory.

  • source
  • parent