548
Me_irl (lemmy.today)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/me_irl@lemmy.world
72 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 2 months ago (15 children)

Why are you even bothering talking to a clanker?

All you're doing is feeding it more data and using more storage/compute power in a server somewhere that's running a gas turbine, when every piece of evidence shows that it'll lie to you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Guys we gotta stop with the "why even" type of comments.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    I am trying to be polite when correcting the AI; just in case "it" remembers[1]. ^^

    I have to look into caveman skill priming to limit the amount of text that comes out of it.

    [1]: or data is being used to retrain or save in persistent context. I use Kagi btw., so I hope they actually respect their promise not to use my prompts for retraining.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Or you could use your own thoughts as a form of "organic intelligence" and bolster them with the knowledge and research efforts of the past few millennia to get a more reliable result, without supporting businesses that actively harm humans.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    AI being shit most of the time doesn't give anyone license to go around getting rude with people because they admit they used it once.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Wasn't trying to be rude, I'm pointing out that if you're using an AI for something that could be done with a human, that there are better options that don't;

    A: lie to you as a function of their existence

    B: help fund and produce misinformation on a scale we haven't ever seen before

    C: actively worsen the climate (both social and physical)

    And D: actively rots the brain of the user by doing their thinking for them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Perhaps you could consider shutting up. Because you're being rude and obnoxious, and you're not paying attention to anything that's being said, you're just wanting to lecture someone because they used a tool to look up a speaker.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    I've considered it many times, but unfortunately it's never stuck.

    What exactly am I "not paying attention to" though?

    A user posts that they had a bad experience with a bot giving them an incorrect answer, I ask why they're even using it knowing what we all know is true about these companies and their business practices, then clarify my reason for disliking said company's product.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yes and most of us are aware of all of this. I don't think admitting to using AI once warrants this lecture. Besides, I don't think they said anything to lead us to believe they'd keep using it despite the problem they encountered.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    They already named their preferred bot in this same thread, and their plans to attempt "limiting the amount of text that comes out of it."

    • turns out this was a comment from a different user talking about being polite to a corporate bot, disregard.
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent