▲ 278 ▼ Grizzly bear historical and current ranges (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz 47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago (4 children) Why did they historically not go further east? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) They did, at least into Minnesota. This range map probably doesn't use data from as long ago as when they did. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago I was definitely thinking the time (and method) of this data collection. It kind of appears to reflect US western expansion. permalink fedilink source parent [–] altasshet@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Pure guess, but the praries are probably not a good habitat for them. Hard for them to hunt, and the buffalos could easily mess them up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago Yeah trees and mountains make sense. Like the Sierra range in California / Nevada. Or the Rockies. But that map shows way down into Mexico where I imagine it is pretty flat and trees are not as dense (which i guess is kind of similar to a prairie?) Interesting point on the buffalo, i can see that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) They did, at least into Minnesota. This range map probably doesn't use data from as long ago as when they did. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago I was definitely thinking the time (and method) of this data collection. It kind of appears to reflect US western expansion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago I was definitely thinking the time (and method) of this data collection. It kind of appears to reflect US western expansion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] altasshet@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Pure guess, but the praries are probably not a good habitat for them. Hard for them to hunt, and the buffalos could easily mess them up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago Yeah trees and mountains make sense. Like the Sierra range in California / Nevada. Or the Rockies. But that map shows way down into Mexico where I imagine it is pretty flat and trees are not as dense (which i guess is kind of similar to a prairie?) Interesting point on the buffalo, i can see that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago Yeah trees and mountains make sense. Like the Sierra range in California / Nevada. Or the Rockies. But that map shows way down into Mexico where I imagine it is pretty flat and trees are not as dense (which i guess is kind of similar to a prairie?) Interesting point on the buffalo, i can see that. permalink fedilink source parent