you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (21 children)

The actual usefulness and potential of smart glasses, especially ones with cameras, is almost unfathomable.

I thought the first paragraph was leading to a decent point, but "unfathomable usefulness" is an almost rabid level of overstatement. There's some fathomable applications as an aid for blind people, but every other use case that's ever come up has ranged from "novelty" to "really fucking creepy" with the occasional "looks like a useful thing but didn't really solve an actual problem we had with the previous way of doing it".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Honestly I see only one use for smart glasses with a camera and AI and that is to help blind people know what is in front of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    You can’t see any other reason why having a heads-up-display on your vision, with AI being able to recognise every single thing in its vision? None at all?

    Even the biggest haters of the technology can surely not be that blinded. Here’s an example for you - real time text and audio language translation, from any language to any language.

    You now can see another reason :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    No I can't because for spoken language I don't need a camera, just a mic and I also wouldn't want to be constantly bombarded with a translation of every foreign language. If I want to translate something I can't read I can get my phone to either type it or use the camera function on that thing. These glasses will not replace my phone and that already has a camera with better privacy option than these glasses will ever have. So no. I do not see a need for a camera that videos everything I see all the time except for some very niece scenarios. If you think you need something like this, then great, but don't expect people taking it kindly that you are filming their every move.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago* (16 children)

    I don’t think it is an overstatement. It could mean full AR the world over. In every shop you could look at something and have a pop up with its price, allergy information, materials, place of manufacturing.

    At every sporting event you could have your own personal replays and multiple camera angles.

    While cooking you could have instructions showing you exactly where to cut, how long to pour, when and how to stir, timers for multiple bits of your cooking, see the temperature of something by looking at it.

    While repairing a car engine you could have every part being labelled for you, with detailed instructions on every single step of everything from changing the oil to rebuilding an engine.

    While driving you could see the speed of other cars, be alerted to potential hazards, see directions from your point of view.

    The limit really is the sky for AR, which is what the end goal is for smart glasses. That’s the unfathomable usefulness of the technology.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (10 children)

    I read your list and stand by my statement. Half the things on that list are novelties that you'd get quickly bored of, and the other half have solutions that don't require pervert glasses. I see zero problems being solved anywhere in the list you just made.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Things don’t need to solve problems to be amazing and revolutionary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (8 children)
    • Doesn't solve a problem

    • Recording everything around you is fucking creepy

    I mean at some stage you have to start wondering about the sort of person with a less-than-one-week-old account that's up in here defending them so vociferously. I notice you're also in other AI threads on Lemmy being equally shilly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

    Nice gate keeping attempt.

    The only community I am subscribed to at the moment is this one. Maybe that’s why? Like you said, I’m just new.

    I’m a tech enthusiast. I love the bleeding edge of tech. I don’t look at a new tech product through the cynical lens that you clearly do. I look at it with an open mind about what it could do and what it could become. Like I said in another comment, people had these same “creep” comments and opinions about cameras on phones, but that thankfully didn’t slow down their adoption and innovation.

    Do you just accuse everyone you disagree with of being a “shill”? You have to wonder about what type of person jumps straight to that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    I've invented a machine that turns my shit into tooth paste. It's the bleeding edge of technology. I'm sure you'll be excited to try it!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

    Ok and I’m looking at that tech through a lens of what it can do and what it can become. Does it completely get rid of all of the germs and bad stuff? Does the toothpaste have the same properties as regular toothpaste? If it does all of that, why wouldn’t you be interested in exploring it?

    That would be a completely revolutionary product that could change the world. It could provide better dental hygiene for the entire world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    LMAO, Or I could have overhyped my product and now your brushing your teeth with my literal shit. Your naivety is adorable, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    But it wouldn’t hold up to the least amount of scrutiny in that case, and not a single person would ever brush their teeth with it.

    It’s like you can’t understand what is being said here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    It's like you're a child who thinks every new technology is useful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    price, allergy information, materials, place of manufacturing

    All of this is already written on whatever product you are buying. These problems the glasses fix are imaginary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Why do people pretend like every product has to “solve a problem”? That’s complete rubbish.

    Imagine walking down an aisle and simply looking at a product, not having to even pick it up, and it tells you that it contains something you’re allergic to or dislike. That’s the kind of thing that is possible at the absolutely lowest level of imagination required.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments