Don’t for one second think I’m defending these laws and the dolts making them. To them, being able to control what you can print in the first place is 10000000x more powerful than trying to sue everyone that sells them.

It’s like you’re a child who can’t comprehend basic sentences.

Yep, and many of them just never plant any trees at all.

One person making a Star Wars set of Armor for themself isn’t a worry for Disney.

That person posting the STLs on the internet, allowing millions of other people to make them too, many of who will try and sell the designs and/or finished product, is a worry for Disney.

That’s the beauty of 3d printing, but it’s the thing that IP holders hate - and the IP holders with deep pockets can and do influence legislators.

They do try and sell it though, that’s the problem.

But it wouldn’t hold up to the least amount of scrutiny in that case, and not a single person would ever brush their teeth with it.

It’s like you can’t understand what is being said here.

No, you’re the one protesting and calling everyone who doesn’t agree with you a creep.

Usually the ones accusing others of being something turn out to be the something.

Ok but the stalking resulting in death doesn’t necessarily involve murder, does it? It just means that they ended up dead, right?

It’s not an automatic kill of the state case actually. There are many legal opinions out there of how it could not, or how it could. It’s not clear cut.

The point is, either way he’s getting life (or death). If somehow he didn’t at the federal level, but was found guilty, the state can still try for murder.

Well not really. Stalking resulting in death wouldn’t necessarily mean they committed murder, would it? If you were stalking someone and they got hit by a car running from you, that’s not murder but it would be stalking resulting in death wouldn’t it?

He’s not getting away without a murder charge, and he’s never getting out of prison.