you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 305 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (30 children)

More OEMs should ship devices with Linux as an option, discounted by the Windows license cost.

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (15 children)

    Here in Brazil, a lot of vendors are offering laptops with linux, but they do this just to offer a lower price, and put the most weird distro possible, that no one knew existed, so everyone who buys have to install their own os. The bad thing about it is that it creates a really bad first impression about linux on common users, who mostly end up asking the tech person from the family to install windows for them

    Edit: another random fun fact: in order to offer a lower price, some brands around here also ship laptops with freedos, don't ask me why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Why don't they just install Mint, Zorin, or even xUbuntu (XFCE versions of each)...

    That's 3 examples with actual support and a user base >3 edgelord cat bois.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    I ask myself the same question. I have no idea. Mine is from vaio and came with some sort of modded debian that looked like a stripped down win xp with custom repos that didn't even load properly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Most distro maintainers would expect something for commercial licences. Can't have them take all your hard earned money! Max I can do is 0$.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    im surprised they don't just do the underhanded method of acquiring windows.

    well I'd imagine theres some stores willing to oblige doing that.

    curious sakes, what distro do they preload on customers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Around here, institutions are quire rigorous with that, so stores have to play by the book. Only very small shops can sell pirate software without getting caught

    About the distros, Each brand seem to put a different one, and they're all weird. Mine came with some sort of modded debian with alternate repos, but was very impractical for use, and ended up installing fedora over it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    They just expect everyone to pirate windows

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Exactly, but if we think about it, just putting some random well-established distro would be faster and cheaper than creating their weird modded versions or making contracts with weird firms. Maybe they want to avoid any unexpected legal issues?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Maybe it has some known vulnerabilities? The more reputable sellers I've seen around here (I'm also from. Brazil) just ship Ubuntu, it's usually the sketchier vendors with the weird distros

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    The problem there is Windows still has negative cost for OEMs due to all the bloatware they bundle.

    They get paid for that McAfee and Epic Games icon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

    meanwhile on the Dell website

    EDIT: $100 of that difference comes from Win11 requiring an SSD upgrade from 512GB to 1TB

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    What currency is that? Windows 11 home is $140 USD.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    They used to have agreements to make it difficult to do so. I don’t know if that’s still the case but it’s pretty awful. I think OEMs had to pay licenses for every machine shipped regardless if it had a windows license.

    The other issue is that oems have a large amount of compatibility and support built up over the years for windows. They also know their customers can deal with Microsoft for “support” and ignore driver and support costs for whatever distro of Linux they were to choose.

    Sure an OEM could lead the way and show everyone else the path to freedom but think of the shareholders

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    They used to have agreements to make it difficult to do so. I don’t know if that’s still the case but it’s pretty awful. I think OEMs had to pay licenses for every machine shipped regardless if it had a windows license.

    Correct.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    they actually make money on many of those windows preinstalls due to all the bullshit they get paid to put on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (2 children)

    The fun part is that they can bundle an equal amount of bloatware on linux for even more revenue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The actually funny part is that they can't. Most of the bloatware is not available on Linux because it doesn't support it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I'm not sure what you mean... linux "supports" bloatware just fine, it's just that we don't have much of that kind of software (yet), and i'm sure they could get it all to run through winboat or somesuch if they really wanted to.

  • source
  • parent