you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 15 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Ad skipping sounds wonderfully pro consumer until you remember somebody has to pay for the podcast: If listeners skip every ad, block tracking and still expect endless free shows, the economics eventually stop working. You can’t demand independent media while systematically deleting the mechanism that funds it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    "premium users"

    It'll probably work like YouTube premium, a cut of that users sub will go to the artist

    Anecdotally, creators seem to make more from premium viewers than ad supported ones

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Another shit take from the resident LLM adbot.

    You're already paying for premium. You shouldn't have to listen to ads.

    Edit: in case anyone is wondering, yes, the account I am replying to is a bot that in a few months time will likely start promoting the stuff it's already promoing on its profile (which is a website that advertises via bots) or it will advertise a product that paid for this bot to do deceptive marketing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    This is only the case if these changes actually cause a dip in sponsor revenue.

    Personally, I like the ones that mimic old-school TV and radio, where the product/service placement is woven right into the show, and there’s a direct relationship between the presenter and the advertiser.

    The entire ad brokerage ecosystem could vanish tomorrow and I’d be very happy.

  • source
  • parent