I've been hearing about these for a few years now. Huge if they work out at a large scale.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

Honestly curious: I'm not a battery or even energy person, but this is interesting.

The charge/discharge efficiencies and rates could just mean we build networks of mixed types? "Trickle" charge/discharge via a slower battery that handles more cycles and is probably way cheaper to build (that's the premise of Na+, right?), but have those batteries back up a more expensive high-rate bank for when power is needed in a burst? Probably a switching problem at that point, which I imagine we already deal with having solar/hydro/fossil/etc.

A Na+ bank sized to handle regular use and charge a Lithium bank when underused so that one is ready for spikes seems like a way to go.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    That is an option. For smaller setup, capacitors are used for high peak demand applications.

    Sometimes a mixed setup is just not worth it, cause the peak demand is the important part, so you end up with like 80% LiPo and 20% Na.

    But I'm certainly no expert on the economics of infrastructure battery installations.

  • source
  • parent