This is a toilet thought, please ban me mods.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 11 points 3 months ago (21 children)

This isn't true because I can squeeze the tip of my foreskin and the pee will start spraying everywhere super fast. Similar to covering the end of a hose with my thumb.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    Similar to the hose, your feeble attempts at restriction only make the stream stronger.

    There is a fundamental pressure being restricted. IF she has a bigger urethra than you, she'll wreck you. If she has a narrow urethra, she might be in the same support group as Hank Hill.

    Either way, the fundamental limit of how much pee can flow will always follow a basic function.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • I used to think that women had larger urethras than men because female catheters are larger. A post similar to this one caused me to do a bit of reading though. Women's urethras are actually a little smaller on average. They can use larger stiffer catheters because their urethras are much shorter and almost straight. Men's catheters have to be narrower because they have to be flexible to go through men's longer curvier urethras.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] [S] -16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I don't even think you know what you're talking about let alone what I'm talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    Because of the inverse relationship between velocity and diameter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] -4 points 3 months ago* (9 children)

    Damn crazy. Do you think the shape of someone's genitalia has an effect on that velocity and diameter?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    The optimal genitalia for urination has zero length. Imagine a frictionless laminar flow from a razor edged hole in your torso!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I've definitely seen public bathrooms where the previous occupant may have been utilising this technique

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Laminar flow means exceptionally smooth and directional without any turbulence or spray, so this would make sense if you visited a bathroom that was spotlessly clean

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7Hyc3MRKno

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You are doing a great job at showing everyone you have no idea what you're talking about. What you replied to says there wouldn't be any splatter etc.

    This post very single reply you've made here has only ticked more boxes on the list of showing your idiocy, ignorance and inability to understand basic concepts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (2 children)

    In theory, maybe. Yet in the real world, enough foreskin to interfere with the flow makes for a smoother flow with no spraying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You should try a twist tie, wrench it shut like it's bread you want to actually keep fresh instead of just twisting it up and tucking it under the loaf like most men do. See what happens!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments