This is a toilet thought, please ban me mods.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] -4 points 3 months ago* (9 children)

Damn crazy. Do you think the shape of someone's genitalia has an effect on that velocity and diameter?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    The optimal genitalia for urination has zero length. Imagine a frictionless laminar flow from a razor edged hole in your torso!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I've definitely seen public bathrooms where the previous occupant may have been utilising this technique

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Laminar flow means exceptionally smooth and directional without any turbulence or spray, so this would make sense if you visited a bathroom that was spotlessly clean

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7Hyc3MRKno

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You are doing a great job at showing everyone you have no idea what you're talking about. What you replied to says there wouldn't be any splatter etc.

    This post very single reply you've made here has only ticked more boxes on the list of showing your idiocy, ignorance and inability to understand basic concepts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (2 children)

    In theory, maybe. Yet in the real world, enough foreskin to interfere with the flow makes for a smoother flow with no spraying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments