you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 103 points 3 months ago (12 children)

Even Wikipedia is union-busting now.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 3 months ago*

    The Wikimedia Foundation has very little to do with what goes on on the English Wikipedia. It hosts the infrastructure, puts some legal policies in place, and really from there, the community-elected administrators (who are themselves active contributors) are the ones who handle enforcement, and the rules are discussed by the community.

    Even the administrators don't exercise all that much power. In ten years, I think I've seen the office have to step in exactly one time – for a possible libel issue when even the administrators couldn't agree with each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 53 points 3 months ago* (7 children)

    Wikipedia and its contributors: Good.
    Domain name owners and server hosters (Wikimedia Foundation): Bad.

    And I might get some hate for this but I think of Reddit the same way. I hate the platform and its owners but what’s ON the platform was posted by the community, for the community.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Who do I donate money to then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Wikipedia and its contributors: Good.

    Not really.

    Domain name owners and server hosters (Wikimedia Foundation): Bad.

    Yes, the people who actually own the website are trash.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Lesser of two evils, one can be better, one can only be worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments