you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

The anointed one gleefully embracing the most lethal neo-conservative partnership in the world, that Harris?

You speak of facts, but conveniently leave out the fact that Trump walloped her so badly he won by a wider margin than there were self-identified protest vote progressives to begin with. It literally made no difference how they voted.

I hope she runs again in ‘28 and has to face an actual primary vote where she will once again receive single digit support. Who knows, maybe if she moves even further right she can pick up some more maga voters and break into the double digits lmao.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    The question is would she have been wolloped if the party was united behind her?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    That question doesn’t make sense. You might as well be asking why Democrats didn’t rally behind Nikki Haley. Still, my answer remains the same:

    It’s wrong to blame the voters for a garbage candidate. Please stop doing that, and demand better of our “representatives” instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    It’s wrong to blame the voters for a garbage candidate.

    that logic excuses voters for trump and i'm not ready to do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    *it's wrong to blame the voters for a garbage candidate that they didn't want

    Repubs went trump because their base demanded it with insurrections. Dems went harris against the will of their people. That's the difference.

  • source
  • parent