you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Yes, water consumption is a shit reason to argue against data centers. Power consumption is the real big issue

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    It's still a valid reason considering how many US counties are struggling with droughts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    But following that argument wouldn't you want to shut down the big water consumers? There are many things using more water than AI data centres.

    Not sure how to correctly link comments across instances on lemmy, but I went way too deep into this in another comment here https://slrpnk.net/comment/23703343

    Tl;dr for this specific case: (animal) agriculture is the main reason the aquifers in USA are drying out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogallala_Aquifer#Accelerated_decline_in_aquifer_storage

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    It’s not even power consumption but the sudden change in power consumption, faster than infrastructure can respond. And more importantly it’s datacenters just bypassing rules for everyone else, such as by running on generators

    There was a video that put it in interesting perspective ….. ai datacenters are only increasing our power usage by like 1%/year and we used to grow energy consumption by multiples of that. It’s not a big deal …… except that now our infrastructure planning and investment is geared toward zero growth.

    In recent years our energy consumption has been flat, so that’s what the industry can support

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    1 pound of beef equals 650,000 prompts in terms of emissions. Livestock is about 150x more emissions than AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments