(cross-post of a thread in !food@slrpnk.net originally posted by someone else)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 3 months ago* (11 children)

I don't remember who told me this "system" to check if food went bad, but it's a great one imo

  1. If it looks good, smell it
  2. If it smells good, taste it
  3. If it tastes good, eat it
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Yea, good advice. But also good to remember you can't smell or taste salmonella, e coli, listeria, botulism, etc...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Of course this approach has its limits. I thought it was clear when I said that this method is to "check if food went bad".

    If something like meat has not been cooked, or a dairy product has not been properly pasteurised, or there where unsanitary food production conditions, or not canned properly etc, this method does not apply.

    It is definately not a way to check if something is eadible in general. And if you are pregnant or have special diatery needs, you know the specifics of your situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago*

    AFAIK, you can't visually assess whether something's been "properly" pasteurized or canned, and plenty of traditional dishes use un/semi-cooked meats.

    The saying smacks of <90s (if not <50s) in its deceptive simplicity, and assumption that the listener is smart enough to suss out the rare moments it's applicable.

    (aside: definitely*, edible*)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 7 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    I would add: if it tastes off, spit it out, as tasting does not imply swallowing.

    Worth noting as well that the taste test can kill you when dealing with some very toxic variaties of wild mushrooms -- even if you spit it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    They never met a wild mushroom, I assume.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Yesterday, I passed a deer chowing down on mushroom fairy ring. Not really relevant, but your mention of mushrooms reminded me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Similarly, I was camping waaay out some years back, and discovered during pack-out that one of my magic chocolate truffles was missing. I found it by the firewood cache, but nearly half eaten, and still being gripped in one of the dead mouse's forepaws. 🤷🏼‍♂️ Ya live & learn, or ya don't, I guess. That little guy rejoined the cosmos in Technicolor, though! 🤗

  • source
  • parent