Miller comments on How China gets better bang for its buck than America in AI. Its investment lags far behind America’s. Its models do not

Technology

89,627 readers

13,807 active

2,300 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] Miller@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

The problem with not doing the heavy lifting yourself and using derived technology and ideas is that in evolutionary terms you are not selecting for innovators. Down the road this approach becomes ingrained both philosophically and in reality as you let your own innovators wither on the vine.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Yeah China's VERY good at reverse engineering stuff and playing catch up. Haven't really seen them take a clear lead in developing new technology in any field though.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's more due to the lack of new technology these days. AI aside most modern engineering is incremental improvements to existing technology—that's the innovation everyone is doing.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments