But what evidence is there of Israel paying off the king of Morocco to have the Moroccan army send migrants to the border of Ceuta? Because that's the alleged conspiracy here. One video without context which could very well be demonstrating the opposite, that's it. In the original now-removed comment I even explained why it'd be strange for Morocco to be involved like this.
I'm not saying that Israel never pulls shady shit; they obviously do (gotta complete a genocide, hard to do without shady shit). The point is that in this case the right uses this to attack innocent third parties who genuinely have nothing to do with this. It's not a reason to reject evidence, it's a reason to be careful with random conspiracy theories that conveniently (and falsely) validate some of the right's main talking points.
If there was actual evidence presented that Israel is involved with this incident, then we should by all means share and publicly accuse. But no such evidence has been presented. I'm not rejecting evidence, I'm stating it doesn't even exist in the first place, or rather isn't being presented here. But I'm not going to go along with a random "jewish conspiracy to ethnically replace christians with muslims" on a whim.