842
Firefox capitulates and returns to Twitter (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/firefox@lemmy.world
339 comments fedilink hide all child comments
☹️ 13 🥲 2
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 3 months ago (20 children)

Thinking X is centrist because it hosts extremist right views is precisely the problem with US politics.

Sorry the censorship got you and now you're salty. I can see why, though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
    •
  • [+] -14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (19 children)

    FYI I don't live in the US

    Sorry the censorship got you and now you’re salty.

    Bro is unironically trying to defend censorship XD can't imagine why! Strange how one side seems to excel without it whereas one other side instantly crumbles eh

    X won't censor your views (literally neither side's - do explain to me how this isn't centrist), go ahead and type exactly what you type here and it'll all show up; the only problem is due to the opposing side also not being censored people will clown on you for the nonsense you spout nowadays, so you'd rather scurry away to isolated areas that continue to censor the opposition so you can all falsely appear to flourish (BlueCry is quite literally old Twitter which used to do precisely this lmao why do you think they all fled to it, "erm acktually sir you can't say this particular fact that dismantles that guy's argument because your fact falls under our abusable hate speech rule, so your content is hidden now sir please understand!"), as it's impossible otherwise ofc

    If you believe censorship of any political side is a good thing I dunno what to tell you mate, speaks volumes on your confidence, no amount of virtual down arrows beside my post of fellows melting down over my text in the shadows will change that fact I'm afraid

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (11 children)

    Censorship of nazis is a good thing

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    Yeah he and all those who agree with him are Hitler 2.0 for sure, that word totally has meaning nowadays when you guys all throw it around over nothing right

    Be sure to let me know when he’s killed 17 million people which will surely include yourself from disagreeing with him (aka what a real Nazi would do to you), I’m sure it’ll happen in reality and not only in the fantasy in your mind!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (9 children)

    Ok nazi simp. Keep simping for nazis

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (8 children)

    -Can't refute me as is incapable of admitting his definition of a Nazi is objectively incorrect

    Lmfao such an interesting pattern evolving from people on this website, you all try and pounce on me with a weak surface-level argument that 'sounds good' yet tuck your tails and run as soon as my response gets too difficult for you to handle, very credible and trustworthy attitudes right here, keep living in lala land pretending he is a nazi as it's the only fake way you'll be 'correct' :)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (7 children)

    Lmfao keeps simping for nazis, thinking digging his nazi simping hole will make him less a nazi simp. Lmfao, such a classic patern of the nazi simp, being defensive when called out on their nazi simping. Keep living in nazi apologize land.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Nice meltdown reply bro, guess I hit a nerve with that one eh

    Define what a Nazi is to me

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (5 children)

    Lol, of course a nazi simp would think that is a meltdown reply, classic nazi simp.

    Since you simp for nazis the ability to understand reality is clearly deficient for you, so here, a super quick and easy web search, since that is too complicated for you

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (4 children)
    1. Doesn't apply at all (surely even you can understand this one)
    2. Doesn't apply at all (although probably falsely applies to you guys since you all live in lala fantasy land together in this bubble and wrongly pretend it's reality by exaggerating nothingness out the ass and holding hands together over it; feel free to give me your specific examples for me to demolish if you disagree)
    3. Doesn't apply at all (literally anyone with any belief is allowed on X, no matter how opposite to his own opinions and beliefs)

    Now explain how I'm incorrect with evidence and examples, welcome to debating like an adult 101

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    Imagine simping so much that you refuse to believe the definition applies to a nazi. Evidence and examples are meaningless to you nazi simps because you dont live in reality lol. Lmfao even.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    -Is incapable of providing any evidence and examples to explain how I'm incorrect

    That's 2 fails in a row with my even holding your hand this time - you're really good at this!

    It's not a hard task bud, unless you genuinely can't provide any ofc, because then it's literally impossible for you and you must try your best to dance around the issue 24/7 without ever addressing it since anything else would be admitting you're wrong :)

    If you were debating me in front of an audience you would be getting laughed out the room right now fyi, this is debating 101, if you cannot address or counter a point you lose by default

    I'll give you 1 last chance my friend, try your best to respond like an adult and not a child, once again your extremely challenging task is to provide ANY evidence and examples to explain how I'm incorrect - surely if I'm some big dummy this should be the easiest task in the world for you right???

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Lmfao, I give you the definition, which applies, and you say it doesn't because "reasons". You are right that people would be laughing, but they be laughing because youre a nazi simp.

    I dont "debate" with nazis and nazi simps. Not worth my time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago*

    Lmfao, I give you the definition, which applies, and you say it doesn’t because “reasons”.

    Yet you can't refute my reasons! "which applies" nah it doesn't and I proved with points why it doesn't - meanwhile you can't prove it does against my points! How strange! (Almost like... you can't! Because they don't apply!)

    You are right that people would be laughing, but they be laughing because youre a nazi simp.

    More like laughing at you failing to argue and debate like anything but a child, whilst somehow genuinely thinking you're 'winning' this argument, delusion of a fundamental concept on a whole new level even above your fantasy Nazi claims

    I dont “debate” with nazis and nazi simps. Not worth my time.

    Well you've pretended I'm one of those for how many comments now and yet it seems you've replied back to me every single time doesn't it?

    Yikes looks like I've made yet another point that you can't refute eh

    Should I say "I don't debate with serial killers" and start pretending you are a serial killer without being able to prove it with all the evidence stacked against me then walk away anyway and say "haha I won!" actually believing myself? DeeLuuSion

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    FYI I don't live in the US

    Did I ask? Do I care? Lol

    Bro is unironically trying to defend censorship

    I only said you got caught and are salty and I can see why, lil bro. Why you salty? Lol

    You type a lot. TL;DR?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    That's right pal tuck your tail and leave as you cannot address any of my points yet are invested enough to reply with a comment of literally nothingness (way to make it be known!)

    Imagine being on a website built for discussion and being incapable of reading 3 sentences and 1 paragraph... oh wait you don't need to imagine that one LOL (and yes people with actual jobs (unlike most of you) involving tech tend to type fast, took me no time at all to write that post lmao)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    TL;DR? 😅

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    You remind me of another winner who acts just like yourself!

    I see it runs in the Lemmy family here; very hard for you all to accept being wrong!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Who is wrong about what? 😂 I just said you got caught by the "censorship filter" and are salty about it.

    Also, I'm not clicking whatever link you give me. It probably has cooties or worse--the dumb.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    X won’t censor your views (literally neither side’s - do explain to me how this isn’t centrist),

    If there's a table with 10 people sitting at it, but only one is visibly a Nazi, how many Nazis are at the table?

    10

    Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Well there appears to be a sea of visible clowns here with me a normal guy being in the mix so does that make me a clown too? It seems I am still not agreeing with you... so I guess that's not how it works after all lmao

    You cannot genuinely be serious in thinking every regular person on X is an actual Nazi though right, like at this point please tell me you're doing this for show and aren't actually this lost from spending too much time online in these bubbles

    An underpaid kid made that smartphone you own so does that mean you are a supporter of child labor? Let me know what you think of this banger logic, I'm sure there's at least 1 nasty animal abuse video up on YouTube right now from a visible scumbag that's slipped through the cracks so I guess everyone with a channel participating on that website is 'invisibly' an animal abuser too, this is such a good thought process it's really strange nobody I've ever met before behaves like this but surely it'll catch on soon though trusttt

    *Also I just realized what you actually quoted LOL your answer doesn't even disprove my point in the slightest, by that same logic if there's one giga leftist still on X raving about abortions I guess it's still left-wing and everyone else is secretly a leftist who wants to kill children in the womb too, makes perfect sense

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent