842
Firefox capitulates and returns to Twitter (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/firefox@lemmy.world
339 comments fedilink hide all child comments
☹️ 13 🥲 2
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

Imagine simping so much that you refuse to believe the definition applies to a nazi. Evidence and examples are meaningless to you nazi simps because you dont live in reality lol. Lmfao even.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    -Is incapable of providing any evidence and examples to explain how I'm incorrect

    That's 2 fails in a row with my even holding your hand this time - you're really good at this!

    It's not a hard task bud, unless you genuinely can't provide any ofc, because then it's literally impossible for you and you must try your best to dance around the issue 24/7 without ever addressing it since anything else would be admitting you're wrong :)

    If you were debating me in front of an audience you would be getting laughed out the room right now fyi, this is debating 101, if you cannot address or counter a point you lose by default

    I'll give you 1 last chance my friend, try your best to respond like an adult and not a child, once again your extremely challenging task is to provide ANY evidence and examples to explain how I'm incorrect - surely if I'm some big dummy this should be the easiest task in the world for you right???

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Lmfao, I give you the definition, which applies, and you say it doesn't because "reasons". You are right that people would be laughing, but they be laughing because youre a nazi simp.

    I dont "debate" with nazis and nazi simps. Not worth my time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago*

    Lmfao, I give you the definition, which applies, and you say it doesn’t because “reasons”.

    Yet you can't refute my reasons! "which applies" nah it doesn't and I proved with points why it doesn't - meanwhile you can't prove it does against my points! How strange! (Almost like... you can't! Because they don't apply!)

    You are right that people would be laughing, but they be laughing because youre a nazi simp.

    More like laughing at you failing to argue and debate like anything but a child, whilst somehow genuinely thinking you're 'winning' this argument, delusion of a fundamental concept on a whole new level even above your fantasy Nazi claims

    I dont “debate” with nazis and nazi simps. Not worth my time.

    Well you've pretended I'm one of those for how many comments now and yet it seems you've replied back to me every single time doesn't it?

    Yikes looks like I've made yet another point that you can't refute eh

    Should I say "I don't debate with serial killers" and start pretending you are a serial killer without being able to prove it with all the evidence stacked against me then walk away anyway and say "haha I won!" actually believing myself? DeeLuuSion

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent