6
Child Sexual Material Distribution in Chatrooms; please remove the comment section from here entirely (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/perchance@lemmy.world
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This again, isn’t the first time I’ve mentioned this ; given the severity of the activity, and the evidence I’ve provided, why hasn’t there been any action

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] -2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

IWontArgueAsAHumanGPT translating 🎉

4chan survives because it has automated hashing tools (PhotoDNA) that scrub known CSAM files at the server level before they load, alongside an established reporting pipe to law enforcement. VRChat has a multi-tiered reporting system, dedicated Trust & Safety staff, and automated logging 🤖

Section 230 has an absolute, explicit exemption for federal criminal law, specifically child exploitation. Under 47 U.S.C. § 230(e)(1), civil immunity completely vanishes when a federal crime is involved. You cannot claim "good faith immunity" under Section 230 for hosting CSAM 🤖

Furthermore, even under civil standards, "Good Faith" requires effective action. If a platform owner is handed active federal NCMEC case numbers showing that their anonymous chatrooms are being used by predators, and the owner responds by leaving the exact same broken, easily bypassed chat system running, that is the legal definition of "bad faith" and willful blindness 🤖

Shifting the blame to parents or individual generator creators is a legally meaningless defense. Parents are not the ones hosting a web server on the clear web; the developer of Perchance is, in essence 🤖

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Yet, you're still posting here on this Lemmy forum without any reply from the Dev who has previously replied to people on this forum and the subreddit when he feels the need to. So, whatever legal threats that you have been posing don't seem to bother him at all. I reckon he feels fairly confident that he can respond effectively to any legal threats that you pose to the website. You're here with your UN soldier avatar having legal arguments with actual users of the website that code generators and use it extensively. Yes, parents should take responsibility for their children's internet activity, I don't understand when that changed. It has always been that way since the inception of the internet, chat rooms, internet porn, forums and all that stuff. British law does not apply to everyone. It is no secret how Britain is slowly becoming a mirror of Communist China in terms of internet censorship.

    It's crazy how you're literally trying to talk up two platforms with massive problems in an effort to denigrate Perchance and its Dev. There are literally whole videos about the scandals on VRchat and 4chan.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTY13VRbSuw

    From the video transcript.

    0:38 "VR Chat is definitely one of the worst games I have ever seen in terms of predators."

    Literal murderers are being inspired have been inspired on 4chan. Where is the Perchance murderer? What shooters are being radicalized to kill on Perchance?

    https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-61460468

    "Packed full of racist and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, memes, hoaxes and and in-jokes, his manifesto is also clearly influenced by the message board 4chan, one of the biggest and most controversial hubs of internet subculture. It is the birthplace of many famous online memes, harassment and trolling campaigns, as well as social, political and conspiratorial movements."

    "Gendron references a 4chan board devoted to guns, and says he was radicalised by the /pol/ or "politically incorrect" board. He also mentions other extreme online spaces he visited, including the neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Interpreting a developer's total silence as "legal confidence" is a massive, naive assumption. He is likely ignoring it because he is a solo hobbyist who is completely unequipped to handle a federal child safety crisis. Missing the point award 🥇; I’m clearly stating they possess the corporate and legal infrastructure to survive federal crackdowns, whereas Perchance's chat feature does not. The BBC article you pasted explicitly states that 4chan was “legally backed into a corner after years of massive federal and international pressure” and forced to use advanced automated tracing tools like PhotoDNA. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IVE BEEN WHISTLEBLOWING 4chan barely survives on a shoestring budget by cooperating with federal agencies and running active hash-filters. Perchance has zero server-side hash filtering. VRChat survives because it logs data, cooperates with subpoenas, and actively hands predators over to law enforcement.

    For the record, since someone as nitpicky as you would assume for some wild reason; I’m not English 🫩. Using the word mate, which is a highly frequent term itself, isn’t limited to the UK at all; and I’ve been citing US legal statues this whole time. The NCMEC is a United States federal clearinghouse established by Congress. Perchance operates on clear-web infrastructure subject to U.S. federal jurisdiction. This has absolutely nothing to do with UK law or "China-style censorship." It has everything to do with strict U.S. federal criminal statutes that carry absolute zero-tolerance mandatory minimums.

    And there was a user, who goes by nosight if the developer would like to verify on the gen I mentioned, that wrote an entire literal testimony abiut how he’d kill student in his school, and how he borrows influence from Adam Lanza

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    No average American calls anyone a mate unless it's a woman or man that they want to mate with, that mate stuff is a British thing. There are four mods on this Lemmy forum it gets nowhere near as much traffic as the subreddit and they still are not interacting with you. They probably saw the same thing I saw.

    “Internal moderation on this site is entirely absent” ➡️ https://lemmy.world/post/49041435

    After seeing that blatant lie from your first post; they likely think that it's not worth their time to address a person that made a false claim about their website in the first place. There is no reason for them to address you when you say that a website that has report functions and bans has no moderation. Because it proved that you were disingenuously lying from the start.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    Trying to dodge a child safety crisis by playing grammar police is a pathetic and morally bankrupt defense. Consider me the first then; do point out which mods would intentionally ignore the topic at hand because I’m apparently ‘annoying’

    ^ Case and point

    As the I clearly explained, the "moderation" on perchance.org/ai-chat consists of an automated AI system that merely triggers a brief, temporary 3-day shadowban if 5 to 6 unique IPs click report. This is not functional moderation against severe criminals. Predators easily alternate their IP addresses with free VPNs in three seconds to bypass the flag and continue distributing horrific materials

    Please stop jerking back to the same points, mate

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •