you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 3 months ago (10 children)

90's supermodel. Images from a reel the makeup artists of ICONIC magazine* posted. Supermodel? Sure, some 1990's supermodels had bad skin, but they didn't claim to filter or Photoshop their faces. The kicker here is all of these images still have a filter on them. I noticed the filter increasing as the makeup artist applied more makeup. There were more glitches. I've realized they are all fakes and frauds. Living a lie with The Birds Papaya. *- There has been no confirmation that Iconic is a real magazine. I'm trying to get their subscriber count; the current estimate is 12. Enjoy the images. Sarah looks NOTHING like what she posts on social media. HER SKIN is shocking. The jawline soft. Like most women her age.

She looks like she is trying to shrink her waist with a hand placement trick. SOOOOOOOO body positive.

#sarahnicolelandry #sarahnicole #filters #thebirdspapaya

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    If there was ever a day when Instagram eliminates the ability to filter photos these woman would be livid. I’m sure they would just edit in other ways but it’s currently too easy for people like Birdshit to blur themselves away.

    Most woman in their 40s will struggle with blemishes on their skin…I suddenly can’t have sugar - I enjoy a piece of cake and I get a breakout! That’s real. Birdshit will blur her already pumped and frozen face and then point out one cute little pimple in a “vulnerable” post. She never shows the skin we see here.

    She also looks aged, probably because we never see her real face…if that makes sense, like she’s doing too much? Honestly, if I saw this shoot in isolation and didn’t know who Birdshit was I think I’d place her in her late 40s, early 50s with ALOT of work done and fighting too hard to hold onto their youth.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    excellent pics and commentary, as always!! i really believe sarah reads here. i think that “natural, no make up” (but still heavily filtered) video she posted of herself barking at her child this morning was a direct response to the images you posted here. her self-obsession and pathological need to try to control how others see her is scary. so is the way she treats her youngest child. there is SO much discourse right now about the damaging and dangerous impacts of using your child for content. it’s unacceptable for her to continue using that poor kid like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    I think you are correct on all accounts. She can't accept that she's a liar or wrong. I feel bad for the kid. She can't process her own negative emotions, so she probably takes them all out on this kid.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    Thank you for the sanity check. It’s actually jarring to see what she looks like irl. Her filtering is egregious. How anyone follows her and she has friends that don’t call this shit out is beyond me.

  • source
  • parent