Copy image? Nope, here’s the link instead.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 4 months ago (4 children)

... as opposed to webp, which also supports transparency?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    If we're talking in terms of vodeo containers (or codecs), then why are we talking about it on a post about webp?

    Unless you consider webp to be a video container because it does support animated pictures, but, again, it also supports transparency.

    Also, HEVC is not a video (/media) container, it's a codec.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    As a lay person, codecs and containers are not visible to me, but the file extension is.

    So .webm would be relevant in a post about .webp, because they are only one letter different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    What are we even talking about?

    fork:

    • implied that webp doesn't support transparency (false);
    • got called out;
    • brought up the topic of video containers (incorrectly) for some reason;
    • got called out again.

    The fact that webm is relevant here is undisputed (or so I believe)

  • source
  • parent