1205
Execs Confused and Horrified by the Huge AI Bills After Thinking They Could Replace Workers for Free (futurism.com)
submitted 4 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
180 comments fedilink hide all child comments
🀣 6
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 67 points 4 months ago (11 children)

Just wait until all the technical debt has to be paid as well.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 22 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    I know what you mean, but the tech debt problem will never get resolved.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Of course but the cost can be mitigated. I've seen an AI built project and the outcome is that you pretty much have to continue using AI to continue development because it's borderline incomprehensible for humans. When AI fails to continue development you scrap the entire project and start from scratch.

    I imagine all companies that allowed AI to go wild in their codebase have a lot of components that need to be rebuilt from the ground up.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    In theory, completely rewriting legacy software with AI could be a great thing - doing so every 3 or 4 years, allowing newer and better AI to tackle the task, optimizing for every development made in technology or standards.

    However, this still requires human minds to define, guide, and verify these projects. AI opens up possibilities for better development, but executives seem determined to fritter away such potential by axing the human element.

    It is like a certain story...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago*

    I don't know how much AIs can be useful on big ass projects, but it def was useful for me when i had to look at the code of a project i made 1 year ago, i was so much worse at writing code and it was such a mess that ultimately i used an AI agent to rewrite it
    Do i feel dirty? Yep
    Has it saved time? YES

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    The tech debt always gets paid one way or another. Either preemptively, as part of ongoing maintenance; or after a data breach in the subsequent lawsuit and settlement; or in the slow, inexorable trickle of increased infrastructure costs and lost business from slow dependencies and ineffectual bandaid solutions.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I already see lots of boutique consultancies popping up specifically saying they will fix tour slop code bases. Developers and doctors will never run out of work.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not sure fixing it will be possible.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago

    They will have to trash a bunch of it and rewrite entire modules and components from scratch.

    I’ve seen as AI keeps iterating over enhancements and bug fixes, the spaghetti code gets worse and worse over time. At some point only the AI understands its own code, as it is too much garbled nonsense for a human to trace through. Eventually that becomes too much garbage for the ai to trace through. And then that’s where you end up.

    The idea that this can be some kind of non-deterministic abstraction layer between pseudo code and actual code is absurd.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent