A woman who previously dated Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner said he drunkenly forced her to have sex after she told him to stop, according to a Politico report released Monday, leading prominent supporters to pull their endorsements and throwing a must-win race for the party into turmoil.

Platner denied the allegation, but said he would be considering next steps for his campaign.

“Regardless of the inaccuracy of the reporting but mindful of the political reality it will inflict, we’re taking the time to reflect on the best path forward,” he said in a video released on social media.

Jenny Racicot, who lives in Maine, told Politico that Platner entered her home in 2021 while drunk and assaulted her. Racicot said she had been in an on-and-off relationship with Platner, but she cut off contact with him after that night and told him the incident wasn’t consensual. A voicemail left at a number listed for Racicot seeking comment did not receive an immediate response.

Platner’s campaign did not immediately respond to an email and phone message from The Associated Press seeking comment.

“Any accusation of non-consensual behavior is categorically false,” Platner said in his video.

Still, the allegation sparked a flight away from a candidate who has long been controversial. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who’d stood by Platner even as the insurgent candidate was hit with prior allegations, said Monday’s was enough. “I’ve been very clear that sexual assault or violence against women is a red line,” Khanna said. “These allegations are very serious and credible. Graham Platner should drop out from the race. I am withdrawing my endorsement.”

Edit: holy shit, these comments are insane.

Regardless of what you believe with this, Platner likely cannot win anymore. He has a week to do the right thing and drop out before he's fully locked in. If he actually gives any sort of a shit (and doesn't just want power, like rapists seeking office tend to), he needs to drop out yesterday.

This is the nail in the coffin for his campaign. It's not time to defend him no matter what, because there's still a week where a new candidate can be put into place. Instead of being mad at people not wanting to vote for him, you should start vocally supporting another candidate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 105 points 4 months ago (79 children)

DAMMIT! After the FIRST Republican hit piece I said I don't care PLATNER is my Guy but now that there's a SECOND Republican hit piece with the EXACT same Allegation I guess I have NO CHOICE but to Vote for the People who will CONTINUE Protecting the Epstein Class!

  • source
  • hideshow 79 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 4 months ago (71 children)

    Yeah, I generally agree with always believing a victim. But in this case, the person is clearly also a political operative. Waiting until just after the primary makes me immediately question her story. At the very least, it shows she cares much more about electing a Republican than she does about actually receiving justice. If she is a victim, she's also an opportunist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 71 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago (43 children)

    Just to clarify, this is a different woman from the one whose actual job is "political operative". This woman could also be timing this for political effect, but supporting Republican efforts isn't her job like the main accuser in the NYT piece.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 43 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (18 children)

    This woman also has text messages and emails to back up her claims.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago* (12 children)

    The parent comment claimed this woman is coming forward as a Republican hit piece. I’m just adding to the conversation by noting she has evidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    She has evidence that she had some contact with Platner. But according to the narrative she describes, there couldn't have been any text messages providing direct evidence of the assault. She's saying that at the time, she sent messages to other people. But it's not like Platner texted her a confession.

    But come on, it's 2026. You need to be a little more cynical, less naive, and have a properly calibrated bullshit detector. Did Platner assault her? Certainly possible. But it's also sus as hell.

    And yes, it clearly is meant to be politically motivated. She may be a Democrat, but as we've seen, plenty of Democrats hate progressive candidates. And the timing is damning. She may be a legitimate victim, but if so, she's also cynically manipulating her rape for political points. She's literally using her sexual assault as a political poker chip. You don't perfectly time the allegation to have maximum political impact otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    How conspiracy minded do you have to be to think she texted her friend warning her about Platner years before his senate run in order to sabotage him now?

    Why else would she say Platner assaulted her in this way other than he assaulted her?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    How conspiracy minded do you have to be to think she texted her friend warning her about Platner years before his senate run in order to sabotage him now?

    Those messages don't actually exist anymore. We have only her word.

    Racicot said she later deleted all her texts and social media correspondence with Platner as she tried to move on from the assault, and said she has not been able to recover the Instagram messages she sent him about the incident.

    I wouldn't call this damning. People react to grief in complex ways. But it also means that you shouldn't spread misinformation about there being text messages. Yes, she claims there were text messages, but ultimately it's still just her word. These texts provide zero evidence, as they no longer exist.

    She claims that a lot of evidence existed in the past, but that all of that evidence has been lost. Is that possible? Sure, that does happen in some cases of rape and assault. Some folks just want to move on. But it's part of a larger picture that together is pretty damning:

    1. She deleted all correspondence with Platner that could corroborate her claim.

    2. She showed emails to Politico from her therapist, where she mentioned Platner and the alleged assault - but those emails and therapy sessions are recent.

    3. There is a man, a later romantic partner, that the victim supposedly told her story to - yet he's chosen to remain anonymous and Politico

    4. There is a woman, a friend of the victim, who Politico says received messages from the victim saying to avoid Platner. Again, the person is anonymous.

    So, all the supporting evidence is either deleted, not contemporary to the events, or from anonymous people that cannot be verified.

    Why else would she say Platner assaulted her in this way other than he assaulted her?

    Because money and power are on the line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Taking quotes of context is slimey. You're lying by doing so. I mentioned how there were apparently text messages, but they had all been deleted.

    There is one and only one contemporary record, and that's some vague facebook messages to an anonymous person that never explicitly say Platner assaulted her. She claims a lot of other evidence exists, but she conveniently deleted it all.

    So, do you care to actually back up your point, instead of just casually throwing around slurs?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, this one is a credible accusation

    Hopefully someone progressive can replace platner if this causes his campaign to pull out

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 4 months ago

    It won't be someone progressive. The people who would be choosing a last minute replacement are the people who didn't want him to win the primary.

    There's no real viable replacement. Even if they choose someone who represented the policies the voters supported in him, which they won't do, Platner is the only one with the justification of being chosen by voters to justify people who didn't vote for him supporting him in the general. Anyone else is opening the door for finding some difference to now mean the candidate isn't the choice of the party.

    And that's in the dreamland where the insiders choose a spare charismatic progressive outsider they had hanging around rather than someone who's in their club.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    No she doesn't. She said she deleted them. From the Politico article:

    Racicot said she later deleted all her texts and social media correspondence with Platner as she tried to move on from the assault, and said she has not been able to recover the Instagram messages she sent him about the incident.

    The other messages are ambiguous (they do not mention rape), or are a few weeks old, between her and her therapist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (23 children)

    I wasn't referring to the earlier case. The woman here is a political operative because her first priority is politics, not justice or closure. You don't time your accusation to maximize political effects if you're not a political operative. Even if she is telling the truth, she is a political operative first, and a victim second.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (22 children)

    I don't care if she's cynical or unlikable or politically motivated if he in fact raped her. He shouldn't have done that if he didn't want people to call him a rapist at inconvenient times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Naw you don't have to vote for rapists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    So what's the other option in this election?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (16 children)

    I do care about her motivations, because motivations tell you a lot. It tells you that her first priority is politics. It's Schrodinger's assault - simultaneously so traumatic as to warrant making an accusation years later, yet so mild that the need for justice was so low that she was able to keep it to herself until the most opportune moment. It's suspicious as all Hell, and I wish folks like you just weren't so credulous.

    You do realize that people lie, right? And Democratic politicians are particularly vulnerable to false accusations of sexual assault, as the base has been conditioned (for good reason) to by default believe victims.

    But you have to keep your brain on. Believing victims is a good general rule. But only a Sith deals in absolutes. You should believe victims, but you also shouldn't be a naive fool. If all it takes for you to abandon a campaign is someone making a politically opportunistic assault allegation, then you will never see politicians you like elected.

    Yes, as a general rule, false allegations are rare. But we're talking about a heated Senate seat, with millions of dollars on the line, where a false accusation can do real damage in the time it takes for the truth to come out. Normally there isn't a lot of motivation for people to make false assault allegations. But in cases like this, there's a huge motivation to do so.

    This is media literacy 101. When someone has a huge motivation to spread false allegations, you need to treat them skeptically, even if "believe the victim" is generally a good first approach.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    My issue with your comment was:

    Even if she is telling the truth, she is a political operative first, and a victim second.

    If she's telling the truth, I don't care if she's a political operative, because what she's telling the truth about is being sexually assaulted by Platner. If you are using the timing as a reason to believe she is lying, then I understand that. But I can't imagine caring about her motivation if she is telling the truth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    First, I'm not conceding that she's telling the truth. I can imagine caring about her motivations, because in this case, she is both a sexual victim and a sexual abuser, or at least an abuse enabler.

    If she is telling the truth, consider who you're talking about here. You're talking about a sexual assault victim that is actively trying to harm other sexual assault victims. She's working to get a Republican elected to the Senate - the same Republican that played a role in getting Roe v. Wade overturned. You're talking about someone that is both a victim and an abuser. Collins winning will be a massive detriment to every citizen of Maine that is a victim of assault or rape.

    That's why it matters. You don't get to play "believe every victim" card when you yourself are actively trying to victimize people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    Its 100% credible. She's got texts and e-mails with friends and a therapist from the time period.

    Graham is done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (12 children)

    No. The therapist ones are recent. They have a few chat messages from friends, but only from people whose names Politico didn't disclose. She explicitly said she deleted most of her texts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    Well I'm going off the actual text in the Politico and NYTimes articles. If you want to cite a video, can you provide a time stamp? I don't have time to watch a 25 minute long video.

    And the fine details do matter. Again, because we're dealing with what has an extremely high probability of being a political hit piece.

    And Graham saying nothing more is coming out isn't damning at all. She herself claims Platner didn't remember the event. Even if she's telling the truth, Platner would have been completely honest when he said he didn't think anything else was coming out. She's claiming he was blackout drunk and had no memory of the event.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Yeah I think this was while you were engaged in the thread, Jake Tapper did an interview with the accuser. Also, can we just say Jake Tapper is also a piece of shit? He's like, goading certain responses out of here. I don't think she has an axe to grind here but Tapper sure does. Tapper also used language like "let him r*** you" and like, come the fuck on CNN. Like what the actual fuck.

    Its gonna be a while before the clip chimps get their hands on this, but it was a CNN interview, so here is CNN's sub 3minute clip of the interview: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=c2hyYJRhzhk

    Longer form if you've got 10 minutes: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=Hz5Nv4-DAnU

    The accusation is that Graham broke into her house black out drunk and r****d her.

    And the fine details do matter. Again, because we’re dealing with what has an extremely high probability of being a political hit piece.

    Not really. Not in politics and not in the broad superficial strokes of the US media apparatus. There are so many moving parts to a political campaign, and especially with a grass-roots, anti-corporate, anti-AIPAC campaign, its a massive blow, a death blow. Its 10PM Maine time? Platner either drops out in the next hour or tomorrow morning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Again, can you provide any evidence of what you claimed - that in a video she claims to have contemporaneous therapist records? I watched the short one, but it doesn't support your claims.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    No, don't you see, she deleted every text message, Instagram DM, call record and any other corrobarating proof that could ever backup the story and never filed a police report for these awful crimes and didn't say a word for the past year because she saw that no one took the first accuser seriously because she was a proud Republican and she actually totally, like, agrees with Platner's policies and is totally a Democrat [citation needed - allegedly voted Trump last year], so she did the wise thing and waited until the 25th hour of what is arguably the determining election of giving Dems the control of senate to write a hit piece about something that happened 7 years ago and hand the election to the 29-year incumbent demonstrably guilty of much worse. It's that simple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 45 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Racicot said she later deleted all her texts and socia media correspondence with Platner as she tried to move on from the assault. and said she has not beer able to recover the Instagram messages she sent him about the incident

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    She deleted the text messages directly with Platner, not with her friends or therapist.

    Racicot also shared details about the alleged assault to the man she dated after Platner, who she began dating in 2022. The man, who was granted anonymity out of concern for his personal privacy, told POLITICO that Racicot had told him in bits and pieces about a bad experience with Platner before confiding the full details of what had happened in 2023. His account of what Racicot told him about the incident matched what Racicot told POLITICO.

    Racicot shared with POLITICO a series of private Facebook messages she exchanged with an acquaintance in 2023, about a year and a half after the alleged assault and well before Platner launched his political career, in which she cautioned the acquaintance against getting involved with Platner. In the messages, Racicot said she had “ended up in a bad situation with him,” describing Platner as “consensually careless” and saying he “doesn’t listen to you when drunk.” Reached by POLITICO, the acquaintance said she received the messages but declined to comment; POLITICO granted her anonymity at her request to protect her privacy in her Maine community.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (17 children)

    Sorry. I have a bullshit detector. She's either not a victim, or at the very least, she cares far more about influencing politics than she does about seeking justice. It's sus as hell. You're incredibly naive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (16 children)

    We've done it, We've circled around to fake news.

    This women has produced dated text messages discussing the assault prior to Planter's campaign. That's pretty solid this time. Plus the connection between these two can be corroborated. Additionally I've heard there are dated therapists notes, but I haven't seen those.

    The Epstein class will not be taken down by other rapists

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (15 children)

    Yes, you are spreading fake news.

    Let's actually be specific.

    This women has produced dated text messages discussing the assault prior to Planter’s campaign.

    This is the only contemporary digital record alleged in any of the stories:

    Racicot shared with POLITICO a series of private Facebook messages she exchanged with an acquaintance in 2023, about a year and a half after the alleged assault and well before Platner launched his political career, in which she cautioned the acquaintance against getting involved with Platner. In the messages, Racicot said she had “ended up in a bad situation with him,” describing Platner as “consensually careless” and saying he “doesn’t listen to you when drunk.” Reached by POLITICO, the acquaintance said she received the messages but declined to comment; POLITICO granted her anonymity at her request to protect her privacy in her Maine community.

    So, facebook messages, not text. And she didn't discuss the assault at all, at least not beyond very general terms. And the people involved are anonymous. It seems she never explicitly said "he assaulted me" to her friends. She made vague allegations that could describe a lot of scenarios, some that would be disqualifying, some not.

    Additionally I’ve heard there are dated therapists notes, but I haven’t seen those.

    Please provide a source, not just "I heard." Because the Politico and NYTimes articles make zero mention of contemporary therapist notes. You are spreading misinformation. There are therapist notes, but they're not contemporaneous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago*

    They're not anonymous to Politico, they would have spoken to them and verified their identities. They're only anonymous in the story to protect them from harassment from creeps who think they're part of a conspiracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    Holy shit dude, those messages are not ambiguous at all. Stop supporting rapists. You sound a lot like a MAGA cultist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (12 children)

    They are ambiguous! Holy shit, stop supporting political opportunists, you sound like a corporate Dem.

    “ended up in a bad situation with him,”

    "consensually careless"

    "Doesn't listen to you when drunk"

    This could describe anything from a guy who puts an unwanted hand on someone's shoulder to full on rape. That's extremely ambiguous! No where does she allege a rape or assault explicitly. That doesn't disprove the rape allegation, but it's also hardly evidence for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Frankly then I'm shocked that you do not understand. My view is informed by the people I know. I've met quite a few people to completely reverse their view once leaving the military. People that joined young, got indoctrinated and stayed in longer than they should. Typically after being pressured by the officers above them to re-enlist.

    Once they got out they began to question their actions more, they began to experience a lot of feelings that they've suppressed. In turn this radicalized them. I've seen it often. Honestly you see the same things with cult survivors

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I'm aware, you don't see how one ingrained into that group could be convinced by his buddies to swap over to the private sector to "just do the same thing for more money". Clearly they rely on recruiting from the military because of its indoctrination practices.

    Basically I see a path where one can do terrible things when pressured or indoctrination by a group. They leave the group and learn what they did was wrong. Which was demonstrated by his new views.

    The issue is this rape occurred well after that and there's no outside force teaching him that's okay like the military did with violence.

    I gotta give you props, usually I begrudgingly hop on the blue no matter who train, but I guess I do have some standards after all. Apparently I'm not willing to vote for rapists.

    I hope I'm wrong and this is all exposed as a plot to tank him, because if that happens then he'll likely have an easy victory. But the evidence so far is pretty damning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    We are running out of opportunities to vote our way out of this. If this country even makes it to the midterms we're going to have one shot to pack the senate with enough radicals that we can end this once and for all and even that's a long shot. My support for Platner comes down to one question.

    "Do I believe he would be willing to vote in favor of jailing or executing every single sitting republican official in the country, as well as complicit sitting democrats?"

    Between him, Collins, and whatever AIPAC stooge the DNC pushes to replace him with my moneys on Platner.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)