I've been internet-diagnosed with autism plenty of times, but the one time I went to get evaluated, they said I didn't have "it."

But if it's a spectrum with different combinations of different traits at different levels of intensity, maybe a diagnosis is irrelevant and what matters is what your constellation of traits actually is, regardless of an official diagnosis (which, let's face it, is probably highly subjective outside of some constellations--that is to say, with a long enough list of psychologits, I could probably get a dx).

Personally, for me, what this means is I can look to autistic literature to see what resonates with me without worrying about the fact that I don't share many of the hard markers for autism. For instance, my investment in the truth often conflicts with social niceties even though I can read people's emotions. I can see myself as an unofficially atypical person in a lot of ways.

I'll leave my resonsances in the comments below. Feel free to share yours.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

My resonance is this comedy special: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGbZqHU-Xew

And this thread I found it in: https://glammr.us/@jessamyn/116836871731695981

This is one of the central themes in Janet McNamara's comedy special, seeing multiple therapists to see if she's autistic.

She got the "do you have problems with tags in your clothing" question, answers no.

Actual answer is, of course "I don't have problems with tags because I have a system"

(me, I don't have a problem with mealtimes because I Have A System)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments