you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

My main disagreement with your point is the word "deserve". I don't actually have a problem with an economic system that rewards some activities more than others, as long as there's a humane baseline for everyone. But I think that's absolutely an economic choice, and not the only reasonable one.

"Deserve" implies to me that there's a moral system judging one activity as more worthy, or better, than another; rather than simply being more valuable to a particular economic model. It seems like a short step from that to deciding some people are more worthy than others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    “Deserve” implies to me

    That's only semantics. You agree with the OP, you only don't like the wording.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I think the wording is crucial on this point, yes. I'm open to terms like "earned", or "justifies".

    "Deserves" has moral connotations to it. As we see now in the US, it's extremely dangerous to associate moral qualities with economic outcomes.

    Also, my original objection was to the question, "Is every human equal?" There, I have no semantic qualifiers - all humans are created equal, and deserve equal rights. Full stop.

  • source
  • parent