▲ 1010 ▼ Cleveland Voted to Kill Its Flock Camera Network. They Have REMAINED ON, With Police Still Using Them (www.gadgetreview.com) submitted 4 months ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 201 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 months ago (6 children) Other cities are just covering them in trash bags. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] farmgineer@nord.pub 14 points 4 months ago (2 children) I started to write about covering, but I don't know the full sensor suite and I assume they can still collect a bunch of data. That sounds good as a first step, though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cecinestpasunecommunication@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago Just breaking them off sounds cheaper, more comprehensive, and more in line with demands. Trash bags feel too much like natural gas was for going green. permalink fedilink source parent [–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago You know, you could fuck with those too. Those sensors are passive devices. They don’t directly engage with what they are observing. Which means they cannot authenticate anything. There’s no challenge-response. So I wonder how hard it would be to flood the blinded cameras with gibberish data. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago People should start snipping wires. Bags only stop visual surveillance permalink fedilink source parent [–] onlyhalfminotaur@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago That city, Dayton, also being in Ohio strangely. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago Preferably after applying an angle grinder. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 14 points 4 months ago (2 children) I started to write about covering, but I don't know the full sensor suite and I assume they can still collect a bunch of data. That sounds good as a first step, though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cecinestpasunecommunication@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago Just breaking them off sounds cheaper, more comprehensive, and more in line with demands. Trash bags feel too much like natural gas was for going green. permalink fedilink source parent [–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago You know, you could fuck with those too. Those sensors are passive devices. They don’t directly engage with what they are observing. Which means they cannot authenticate anything. There’s no challenge-response. So I wonder how hard it would be to flood the blinded cameras with gibberish data. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cecinestpasunecommunication@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago Just breaking them off sounds cheaper, more comprehensive, and more in line with demands. Trash bags feel too much like natural gas was for going green. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago You know, you could fuck with those too. Those sensors are passive devices. They don’t directly engage with what they are observing. Which means they cannot authenticate anything. There’s no challenge-response. So I wonder how hard it would be to flood the blinded cameras with gibberish data. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago People should start snipping wires. Bags only stop visual surveillance permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlyhalfminotaur@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago That city, Dayton, also being in Ohio strangely. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago Preferably after applying an angle grinder. permalink fedilink source parent