you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Very, very, very harsh. Too harsh.

Would love to see just a single one of the besuited cunts who are polluting our rivers and air get this kind of treatment by their mates in the courts. Never gonna happen tho - this has been a rich man's world for centuries.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    i disagree with this being too harsh, but do agree with the second point about wishing to see this type of punishment extended to the industrial villains, who will never see it, deserving this type of punishment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That's fair. I understand the frustration and anger at these two and what they did - it was senseless and I was definitely a bit heartbroken to read about the felling at first - but four years is so long and they're going to come out worse for it, in my opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    From what I understand, they really fucked around the court and lied about it which is why the sentence is harsh. If they had just admitted it, they probably would have got a suspended sentence.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    "this kind of treatment" meaning harsh sentences. Fining a company means very little 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    My point was that individuals have been responsible for a lot worse, but never held accountable. It didn't have to be rivers and fish. I could have linked to the endless other articles referring to the destruction of something. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmjj5gl6m0po

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments