Human slop is less likely to get off the ground.

For example: https://github.com/TuncorReUnion/TLAC-MODERN-LOCAL-ANTI-CHEAT-REUNIONED/blob/main/kernel/tlac_kernel.c

If a human were capable of crafting that much of a kernel module, they absolutely would know better than "if you are suspicious, you have to name yourself suspicious" logic on display. That lack of understanding usually precludes getting to an even vaguely coherent code for a kernel module.

Even as human slop manages to compile, it tends to be more obviously bad looking. The AI slop looks more like decent coding practice, just wrapping dumb concepts.

Finally, there's the volume. Human slop takes someone fumbling a long time to deliver relatively little code. AI slop vomits up gigantic changes in moments. So with the door open to AI slop, you get overwhelmed with the volume of crap.

No, AI is hardly worse than civil malpractice which is why it should always be against the rules to slop.