346
Deleted (aussie.zone)
submitted 4 months ago by to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
131 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

it is unreasonable to ask people to disclose something just so others can shit on them for it.

I totally dig what your saying. I'm not a downvoter period. In my short time here at Lemmy, AI assisted projects are going to get shit on one way or another. It's unfortunate, but it is what it is. I think the narrative of this thread is to attempt to make things conducive to all users. I personally do not outright reject AI assisted projects. My main concern is if I spin up a container and it turns out to be a doughnut. AI assisted or no, unless you speak multi code languages fluently, you are taking a risk either way. You are placing your trust in the dev and the few that can read code.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    you are taking a risk either way. You are placing your trust in the dev and the few that can read code.

    There is definitely a trust issue and a need for ways of conveying and building trust in smaller software projects. I think a much better solution there would be discussions about the code and how it works that aren't hostile interrogations with foregone conclusions in pursuit of a broader anti-AI agenda. If someone just put a lot of effort into making something the details of that process should be on their mind, it should be possible to make them more accessible to people and convey that there is non-artificial understanding behind the project. Automatic hostility and suspicion makes those kinds of conversations harder and less likely.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •