▲ 165 ▼ William Sherman is not a hero or an icon to be admired 19th Century History (thelemmy.club) submitted 4 months ago by Grumpus_Maximus@thelemmy.club to c/historymemes@piefed.social 12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago (3 children) Wait, why is it racist to hate some general? They're all tools of the state, and perfectly valid to hate permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (2 children) Sherman used brutal tactics to break the confederacy morale, including the burning of Atlanta. So, someone opposing Sherman because they're racist is someone who thinks the confederacy was actually a good thing. Cause, ya know, they're racist. Or very stupid. But, I repeat myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) I still don't think that hating a general that would destroy civilian infrastructure and lives is a racist thing. Defeating the Confederacy wasn't a one man project. Other generals did their part, without the brutality or wanton destruction. Dude committed a war crime, by modern standards. It's perfectly reasonable to hate him as much as it is to hate Rommel, or Hannibal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago Fair point. I did, however, specify what group I was talking about, and while there are definitely some woke racists out there, gonna say they're not gonna be people I'd associate with regardless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (2 children) Sherman used brutal tactics to break the confederacy morale, including the burning of Atlanta. So, someone opposing Sherman because they're racist is someone who thinks the confederacy was actually a good thing. Cause, ya know, they're racist. Or very stupid. But, I repeat myself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) I still don't think that hating a general that would destroy civilian infrastructure and lives is a racist thing. Defeating the Confederacy wasn't a one man project. Other generals did their part, without the brutality or wanton destruction. Dude committed a war crime, by modern standards. It's perfectly reasonable to hate him as much as it is to hate Rommel, or Hannibal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago Fair point. I did, however, specify what group I was talking about, and while there are definitely some woke racists out there, gonna say they're not gonna be people I'd associate with regardless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 child) I still don't think that hating a general that would destroy civilian infrastructure and lives is a racist thing. Defeating the Confederacy wasn't a one man project. Other generals did their part, without the brutality or wanton destruction. Dude committed a war crime, by modern standards. It's perfectly reasonable to hate him as much as it is to hate Rommel, or Hannibal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago Fair point. I did, however, specify what group I was talking about, and while there are definitely some woke racists out there, gonna say they're not gonna be people I'd associate with regardless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 point 4 months ago Fair point. I did, however, specify what group I was talking about, and while there are definitely some woke racists out there, gonna say they're not gonna be people I'd associate with regardless. permalink fedilink source parent