you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 4 months ago (8 children)

News outlets like to pretend that cessation of further attacks is failure. We started the war with a Tomahawk missile which killed 168 people, more than 100 school children. Destroyed apartments, hospitals, bridges, water supply. Continuing that shit would have been a success? A victory?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • I mean, America likes to destroy civilizations (a country that has Native genocide as its origin story), it's the anti-civ "civ" after all, so I guess it is an American failure. Now, those now left in power in Iran could still sell off the country to Western oligarchs, which would be a victory for America but that's still seemingly undecided.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -3 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    Not really, because he describes an escalation, which is the third option. As in there are 2 ways to continue the war, status quo or escalation, and the alternative to those is the peace agreement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Holy fuck I've never seen someone so callously support continuing to kill civilians just to get "a better deal" when it took 3 months of killing civilians and life supporting infrastructure to get to this deal.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)