▲ 127 ▼ Ford is now building low-cost LFP battery cells in the US that will power its $30,000 EV pickup (electrek.co) submitted 4 months ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/electricvehicles@slrpnk.net 52 comments fedilink hide all child comments Ford is set to become the first to use LFP batteries in a mainstream EV in the US, starting with its $30,000 midsize pickup.
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (12 children) Honestly what I’d love to see is more classic vehicles get remade as EVs. Like the VW Bus, could you imagine if they brought back the Bel Air as an EV? It would sell like crazy. That’s how they need to go about getting EVs popularized in the US permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (2 children) Look up the ID Buzz 😉 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 child) That’s the one I was talking about above. I was saying I want more of that, but like classic cars like the ‘57 Chevy Bel Air. I’d buy one in a heartbeat if they made one. Or like could you imagine if they went backwards on the trend of giant trucks and started making smaller classic body trucks, like if they remade the ‘95 Ford Lightning or brought back the El Camino? Smaller vehicle, lighter body, further range on battery and it’d look fucking clean permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 months ago How old are you? The BelAir is just a bloated Detroit tank. permalink fedilink source parent [–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago Toyota has some ideas about that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children) Uh, VW already tried that and it flopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago It's because of the price. I would've bought one already of it didn't cost so damn much. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children) Idk. I’ve seen a few, but it’s also a bus so I can see the lack of appeal. Minivans haven’t been popular for sometime. Try a more popular classic body and the reception would be wildly different. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] noodles@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago I think it's more likely to have flopped because it's a $60k+ car with less range and barely faster charging than the (until recently) $20k Chevy bolt, and it's big appeal would be road trips that it can't competently handle. If they had sold it at a price competitive with its actual competition, e.g. other minivans, and/or if it had decent range it probably would have done better. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago In Ontario, there is a 14 month waiting list for a Sienna. The only other option is the Chrysler Pacifica and people would rather wait a year than drive that turd. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago Because it had poor interior room and a stupid price. Exact opposite of the vanagon. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago Oh fuck me! An all electric, or even hybrid 57 bel air? I just jizzed my pants at the idea permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (2 children) Look up the ID Buzz 😉 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 child) That’s the one I was talking about above. I was saying I want more of that, but like classic cars like the ‘57 Chevy Bel Air. I’d buy one in a heartbeat if they made one. Or like could you imagine if they went backwards on the trend of giant trucks and started making smaller classic body trucks, like if they remade the ‘95 Ford Lightning or brought back the El Camino? Smaller vehicle, lighter body, further range on battery and it’d look fucking clean permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 months ago How old are you? The BelAir is just a bloated Detroit tank. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 child) That’s the one I was talking about above. I was saying I want more of that, but like classic cars like the ‘57 Chevy Bel Air. I’d buy one in a heartbeat if they made one. Or like could you imagine if they went backwards on the trend of giant trucks and started making smaller classic body trucks, like if they remade the ‘95 Ford Lightning or brought back the El Camino? Smaller vehicle, lighter body, further range on battery and it’d look fucking clean permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 months ago How old are you? The BelAir is just a bloated Detroit tank. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 months ago How old are you? The BelAir is just a bloated Detroit tank. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago Toyota has some ideas about that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children) Uh, VW already tried that and it flopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago It's because of the price. I would've bought one already of it didn't cost so damn much. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children) Idk. I’ve seen a few, but it’s also a bus so I can see the lack of appeal. Minivans haven’t been popular for sometime. Try a more popular classic body and the reception would be wildly different. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] noodles@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago I think it's more likely to have flopped because it's a $60k+ car with less range and barely faster charging than the (until recently) $20k Chevy bolt, and it's big appeal would be road trips that it can't competently handle. If they had sold it at a price competitive with its actual competition, e.g. other minivans, and/or if it had decent range it probably would have done better. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago In Ontario, there is a 14 month waiting list for a Sienna. The only other option is the Chrysler Pacifica and people would rather wait a year than drive that turd. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago Because it had poor interior room and a stupid price. Exact opposite of the vanagon. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago It's because of the price. I would've bought one already of it didn't cost so damn much. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children) Idk. I’ve seen a few, but it’s also a bus so I can see the lack of appeal. Minivans haven’t been popular for sometime. Try a more popular classic body and the reception would be wildly different. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] noodles@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago I think it's more likely to have flopped because it's a $60k+ car with less range and barely faster charging than the (until recently) $20k Chevy bolt, and it's big appeal would be road trips that it can't competently handle. If they had sold it at a price competitive with its actual competition, e.g. other minivans, and/or if it had decent range it probably would have done better. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago In Ontario, there is a 14 month waiting list for a Sienna. The only other option is the Chrysler Pacifica and people would rather wait a year than drive that turd. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] noodles@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago I think it's more likely to have flopped because it's a $60k+ car with less range and barely faster charging than the (until recently) $20k Chevy bolt, and it's big appeal would be road trips that it can't competently handle. If they had sold it at a price competitive with its actual competition, e.g. other minivans, and/or if it had decent range it probably would have done better. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago In Ontario, there is a 14 month waiting list for a Sienna. The only other option is the Chrysler Pacifica and people would rather wait a year than drive that turd. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago Because it had poor interior room and a stupid price. Exact opposite of the vanagon. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago Oh fuck me! An all electric, or even hybrid 57 bel air? I just jizzed my pants at the idea permalink fedilink source parent