59
Your Computer May Soon Require an Age Check. And You Might Have to Prove It (www.pcmag.com)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 5 months ago (10 children)

Billions of years decrypting these attestation ciphers is not in my “investment” scope.
Try !libreculture@lemmy.ca hardware.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Decrypting? I don't think any of the similar-strength protection measures which have been defeated were done by brute-forcing the decryption key. There would undoubtedly be attacks which exploit other flaws.

    That said, I agree that libre hardware would be the better option.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago*

    🤝 I already Q.E.D. what I intended 🧵.
    You’ll have to talk to my wife if you desire further engagement regarding novel ways to bypass these attestations. But directly definancing these Nazis/Zionists is far more impactful ventures.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (7 children)

    not like you get a choice other than to comply

    being upset about it here won’t do much

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    I don't think you are in my scope either:
    What computer have you designed?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    we talking hardware or software here and how deep does one need to go for it to count?

    do i have to mine my own silicon? maybe rub some silk on amber to generate my own electricity

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (4 children)

    we talking hardware or software here and how deep does one need to go for it to count?

    Are you free to alter anything? Is your scope not the 4 freedoms?

    do i have to mine my own silicon? maybe rub some silk on amber to generate my own electricity

    If you want to add this to your scope, go for it.
    I still don't see your schematics, so I believe our negotiations are over.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    please tell me this just some attempt to troll and not how you interact with people in general

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    I pressume you know nothing about privacy, since you're here asking me what my privacy model is, unlike yours. How far are you willing to enable common everyday folks privacy tooling?

    I don't go to the threadiverse to engage in sophistry.

    Do you publish open hardware, or are we done engaging your inability to produce privacy respecting hardware?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    i just don’t care

    you are over complicating the fuck out of this in a painfully confidently correct kinda way

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    Then delete all your comments to this thread.

    I only engaged because it should provide educational for the ignoble.

    Try getting educated, maybe you’lll find out why there isn't a collectively owned fab.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent