you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

Because 9/10 times they are awful, expensive, unused, and quickly shut down.

You don't see any of these niche techslop pods operating anywhere you actually go, because they don't work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I don't know why you're being downvoted. I'd say you're wrong, because it's 10/10 times these things don't work. I've seen many similar projects get proposed, funded and abandoned (even some that really did sound more efficient than this to me). The truth is, standard trains are still the cheapest thing you can put on those rails. They're simple, repairable, predictable, they don't break easily, can be easily driven by anyone or automated with standard systems that have been around for decades. Even if a small govt can't buy a new train, they can get second hand trains from other cities, which will still work perfectly for decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    have you actually looked at what we're talking about, like at all? or are you just following the programming of "small vehicle=bad"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    okay so where do these things actually work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    on the testing tracks, because it's new technology and needs to be exhaustively tested before the government allows it to be put into service.

    like, trains were also new technology at one point, being new doesn't somehow inherently make it bad lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment