you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 141 points 5 months ago (42 children)

Some core developers of Lemmy are hardcore tankies and that attracts others.

Also, for someone from Africa it's weird to claim they are not involved in this. China is strategically investing in African countries. If your country has any mineral or other strategic resources, China is no doubt already there.

  • source
  • hideshow 42 child comments
  • [+] [S] 93 points 5 months ago* (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 34 points 5 months ago (22 children)

    Has the political stance of the devs ever impacted lemmy in any way? From what I can tell they do a pretty good job isolating their views to their instance. Honestly apart from a few comments I rarely see any tankies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    From what I understand, the devs are not injecting their political views into the Lemmy code. That does not mean they have not had a pro-tankie influence on the Lemmy community. As the original developers, they also set up the first major instance, lemmy.ml and they moderate that instance to have a tankie lean. Since it was the first instance, many people created their first account for it and it was the de facto standard place to start communities. As far as I know, it is still one of the most active instances.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 5 months ago* (12 children)

    Yes. As per OP, tankies are everywhere in Lemmy. More so than other platforms, it's hard to miss. OP isn't wrong about that.

    If a user isn't aware of tankies, they could easily be swayed by the constant posting of pro-CCP crap here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (11 children)

    I keep reading about this, can you show me some examples of pro-CCP sentiment? Tbf I block political communities anyway but I'm curious what tankie behaviour people keep referring too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    just have a look at genzedong@lemmygrad.ml but put your tinfoil hat on before to prevent potential brain damage

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

    I went to their instance but only found a single post?

    Edit: Oh it's a community, but it's contained right? I'm getting pretty tired of people talking about Lemmy in general when a simple defederation solves the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    lemmygrad.ml is not federated with many, many other instances exactly because of their authoritarian BS, including dbzer0.com. you might need to log out and visit lemmygrad.ml directly.

    If you want the general idea you can also just take a look at yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com and search for lemmy.ml.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    I went to lemmygrad to view the user, I know about the defederation I didn't realise you were talking about communities

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    doesn't make sense to single out any user over there, they are all bootlickers for the kinds of Putin and Xi. Funnily enough, this would make them prime MAGA material too lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    I get it, it's just not a good enough reference for a Lemmy-wide issue. Reddit had MAGA and die hard conservative communities, but they stay isolated; just as I'm seeing here on Lemmy. On Reddit they had brigading issues periodically, just as on Lemmy, you can just defederate on instance or user basis and problem solved.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Tbh there is little evidence. There is a lot of shitposting people socialists are pissed off being called "tankie" or communist as a slur. I mean this shit is old. McCarthy would love this "oh you're a tankie!" shit.

    The worst I've seen is a communist community discussing that Stalin needs to be rehabilitated for his role in building up the USSR despite his "mistakes" (The big oopsie of 3.3 million dead in the great purge). I mean that is just stupid.

    The larger issue is the laser focus the liberal community has on tankies, it's not the fascists that are currently rising or already ruling, noooo it's the "authoritarian tankies" that are at the lowest of their power ever. Whoever has been putting money into this tankie meme is brilliant. Just amplify that shit and stoke that hatred. Fascism bad, but oh please don't be too radical lol.

    So basically lemmy failed as a platform precisely because the neoliberal have managed to already cut out the socialist heart of lemmy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago*

    Where are you getting 3.3 million killed in the purges? The number of sentencings to death was ~799,455, and we know many were canceled as the purges went beyond what was expected.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    I'm sorry but not one part of your comment shows any problem with lemmy. We're using federated social media specifically so any instance/community can exist is a vacuum, and that includes those you do not agree with.

    There are plenty of comms not having anything to do with politics that thrive, politically loaded content does slip into my feed and discussion is rarely uncivilised - on par with early reddit days.

    lemmy failed as a platform

    This is exactly my problem, you think lemmy is one platform. It is not. It's interconnected but seperate bubbles of activity that are brought together by federation, which has always been optional.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    If you include impact to mean a bunch of bans and defederations, sure?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I'm specifically referring to the devs themselves. Defederation being used exactly how it was intended.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (13 children)

    I love that you think Africa's dog in the fight is because China is strategically investing in Africa and chasing mineral and strategic resources when nearly every single African country's borders were defined by the West, when entire countries were created and colonized by the West, when the US is actively bombing multiple countries in Africa and has been for decades, when the West was literally torturing, raping, kidnapping, murdering, and mass murdering Africans all over the content for centuries, when many African countries are economically subjugated by Western countries to this day by control over currency, predatory loans and structural adjustment programs designed to create dependencies, etc.

    Africa's dog in the fight between the West and Asia comes primarily from the West's total subjugation of the continent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    And there's the tankie whataboutism I have been expecting. Everything you said is true, but my point is that China is strategically investing and they don't care about Africa, only China. African countries very much need to be aware of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    China is strategically investing and they don't care about Africa, only China

    Yes, sure, it's not altruistic. But there's a huge difference between non-violent trade relationships which benefit one party more, and also benefit the other party, just less, and purposefully ensuring that an entire continent is in a constant state of civil war and desperate poverty so you can extract the maximum amount of resources through slavery. China's foreign policy is absolutely for its own benefit but they're taking a "rising tide lifts all boats" approach there and while there are some specific things which are fair to criticise it's way better than what other major powers are doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    As a westerner, is it really true that all Chinese investors in Africa really don’t care in the continent? It might be true but I have seen no stories showing positive relationships. That may be by design in western media?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago*

    Holy shit? You think this history is whataboutism? The OP said "I don't have a dog in this fight [because I am from Africa]" and you said "[you should have a dog in the fight because of China's behavior]"

    Hello? Reading comprehension? How does establishing that OP should have a dog in the fight because of Western history in Africa become "whataboutism"?

    This is thought termination at its finest

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago

    See, this is the issue. Someone doesn’t absolutely obliterate China and the .world liberals all wake up and spout their state department talking points. “China BAD! Leftists tankies!”

    What about any of that was untrue? Where’s the tankie part? Cite examples.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Anyone who disagrees with my worldview is a tankie

    Who's the tankie? The person saying that China hasn't bombed anyone in over 35 years or the person saying "I don't know why they hate the US so much" when the US attacked over 15 countries with tanks, bombs, drones, and missiles over the exact same time period. Might need to check yourself

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    This is irrelevant to OP's point about Lemmy being pro-CCP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Are you literally just going to ignore the entire other half of the post asking about why people are anti-western and saying they don't have a dog in the fight because they are from Africa? Are you that committed to attacking your political opponents that you can't even see the words that aren't about your desired debate position?

  • source
  • parent