you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 5 months ago (4 children)

And there's the tankie whataboutism I have been expecting. Everything you said is true, but my point is that China is strategically investing and they don't care about Africa, only China. African countries very much need to be aware of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    China is strategically investing and they don't care about Africa, only China

    Yes, sure, it's not altruistic. But there's a huge difference between non-violent trade relationships which benefit one party more, and also benefit the other party, just less, and purposefully ensuring that an entire continent is in a constant state of civil war and desperate poverty so you can extract the maximum amount of resources through slavery. China's foreign policy is absolutely for its own benefit but they're taking a "rising tide lifts all boats" approach there and while there are some specific things which are fair to criticise it's way better than what other major powers are doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    As a westerner, is it really true that all Chinese investors in Africa really don’t care in the continent? It might be true but I have seen no stories showing positive relationships. That may be by design in western media?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago*

    Holy shit? You think this history is whataboutism? The OP said "I don't have a dog in this fight [because I am from Africa]" and you said "[you should have a dog in the fight because of China's behavior]"

    Hello? Reading comprehension? How does establishing that OP should have a dog in the fight because of Western history in Africa become "whataboutism"?

    This is thought termination at its finest

  • source
  • parent