you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 5 months ago (6 children)

They want to use the bike lane so they don't have to follow traffic laws.

Bike infrastructure is good, capitalism still bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    I don't disagree with you at all.

    just wondering if a big chunk of NY delivery/cargo vehicles were electric cargo bikes like that, would it be an improvement? (given that will force turning car lanes into bike lanes).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Theoretically it would be less asthma for children that's really not nothing.

    But the batteries for those ebikes almost certainly come from children in mines.

    It all ends up as borrowing from tom to pay peter back when amazon is involved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Ebikes take much less resources than cars. Complaining about reducing the resources and energy needed for transportation is disingenuous.

    You cannot pull a "no ethical consumption under capitalism" to protect the current status quo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    Not abusing a sentience in another country so you can have your funco pops at home is also not nothing.

    I'd like amazon logistics to be broken up and owned by the communities it inhabitants. But I'd also like that to happen to GM and Ford too. If you catch my drift.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment