you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 5 months ago (6 children)

ok that's just the claim again. i read about historical zionism in the context of palestine, and with what i read even just on wikipedia i'm inclined to believe what you're saying is true.

still, comments on the internet are quite impactful sometimes, and i believe you should add a source when making a non-obvious claim

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

    it's literally a statement telling you to Google the term. I print and distribute them. If you can add sources to stickers thats the closest it can be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

    oh i read that as a call to boycott google and some google's agreement.

    i might be dumb one in a thousand, but a period after the first sentence would help.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    nah, the keming and the fonts tend toward your interpretation just from casual reading. you have to distinguish the beginning of each new clause somehow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    no worries. a line, a bit more of a gap before google, a font change, something to tell me i'm reading a new sentence there. I know i'm the last one to talk about punctuation as i ignore most of the rules, but something would help to remind me i'm googling the [haasvara? spelling from memory in my replies it's been a month] agreement, not boycotting google (the folk you're reaching are already doing as much of that as they can probably, but i'll admit to projecting here).

  • source
  • parent