535
Me_irl (lemmy.today)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/me_irl@lemmy.world
132 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 5 months ago (18 children)

Ha ha.

It's sad you think you're funny actually.

I mean I know they don't teach economics in the usa (guess you're from there) but man, it's not that hard to understand. Less money=>cheaper housing, access to more money=>more expensive housing.

But you need to think 2cm farther than how it is for you yourself right now today. I have never said that you should change for an expensive bank loan, lol, but just how market dynamics work when loand are expensive.

Well well, good luck to you all!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (16 children)

    You are also espousing that there should be fewer home owners in a country that is already strained with wealth inequality.

    I've just been waiting for you to say something actually useful.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (15 children)

    Lol no I did not say that, to the contrary, I said there are a set number of houses (it does change but not very fast, not like other commodities like tomatoes or oil). And everyone needs one (1). That's why when people can borrow loads of cheap money, prices go up.

    That's so hard to grasp?

    Fascinating.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (14 children)

    There aren't a set number of houses, though. We can build them according to need. Many projects in my area.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (13 children)

    That's good and all and has an effect of course (many things do).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (12 children)

    You sound like a college freshman at a low-tier midwestern university who just took a freshman business course and is now an expert in the actual economy.

    You can’t collapse the assumptions of something as expansive and complicated as a housing market into basic notions of supply and demand. It is, without a bit of irony on your part, that you keep calling out literally everyone in the thread with “lol, don’t you understand basic economics???” More or less what everyone is trying to explain is that freshman level economics is not applicable to the real world here.

    The truth that you can’t see is that your framework is just too overly simplified to matter here, as are your conclusions.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (11 children)

    Insults is what the idiot uses when he's out of rhetoric.

    It's not my fault you don't understand the the housing supply chain. Maybe you shouldn't try to "explain the basics" and sit back and think about it, it's not the simplest of things to be fair. I'm just answering because you seem eager to understand (and the lol is responses to more or less "u so stoopid, stoopid").

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    You already said you needed to rule out fundamental realities like the ability to create more supply quickly and easily. Nor the surplus we face.

    I don't think you have the slightest idea of what you are talking about, that is all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (8 children)

    You sound like an old AI, your first sentence is just gibberish, the second insulting.

    That will get you nowhere lol.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    You don't understand. I don't care. No one here does.

    The point is you are applying college-freshman level principles to a rather complicated system. People keep arguing and downvoting not because of your self-perceived smart-troll brilliance, but because you are just spouting nonsense.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    "no one cares about you" what a stellar argument.

    Do I "care" you think? Here is how much I care about some homeowner who thinks he's smarter than economy professors:

    Blocked.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Aww, boohoo. You couldn't back up your claims, spent hours arguing for them, and then have to end it with an embarrassing "blocked" like anyone gives a shit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •