TranscriptTitle text: This is how you all fucking sound

[A smug tech bro wearing a sideways cap, watch, chain around his neck stands in front of a data center by a lake with dead fish. A smoke stack blows pollution into the air]

Tech bro: AI is already here, there’s no going back.

[A smug man in a suit with cigarette in hand stands in a restaurant while two disgruntled diners cough from the smoke]

Suit: Smoking indoors is already here, there’s no going back.

[A smug man in a top hat and suit stands in a factory with two sad and dirty children]

Hat: Child labor is already here, there’s no going back.

[A smug plantation owner stands in front of a field with with two angry slaves]

Plantation owner: The Atlantic Slave trade is already here, there’s no going back.

Still Vreni on Bluesky

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Well i think commenter used it correctly here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    No, i think it's standard good argumentative writing to state your conclusion up front with the explanation following it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)